Trial reportJACC. Cardiovascular interventions2016
6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Long Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01308281 (Impact of IntraVascular UltraSound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 23 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of IntraVascular UltraSound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions (IVUS-XPL Study)
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 23 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Shorter Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Older Adults After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with established coronary atherosclerotic disease.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2023Pooled it
- Abbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of Short-Term DAPT and Long-Term DAPT on the Prognosis of PCI Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of biodegradable and newer generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising of 43,875 patients.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in East Asians: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and stability of coronary heart disease: a 60 000-patient meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Open heart · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With New Generation Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Circulation · 2020Pooled it
- Benefits of short-term or prolonged as compared to standard 1 year DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Pooled it
- Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (≤6 months) after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Short-versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Pooled it
- Bayesian Analysis: A Practical Approach to Interpret Clinical Trials and Create Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2017Pooled it
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether a 6-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration was comparable with a 12-month duration in patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation.
backgroundWell-designed studies that determine optimal DAPT strategies after everolimus-eluting stent implantation are limited.
methodsA total of 1,400 patients (implanted mean total stent length >45 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 6-month (n = 699) or 12-month (n = 701) DAPT between October 2010 and July 2014 at 20 centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) major bleeding at 1 year, analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach.
resultsThe primary endpoint occurred in 15 patients (2.2%) in the 6-month DAPT group and 14 patients (2.1%) in the 12-month DAPT group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07; p = 0.854). Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.3%) in the 6-month DAPT group and in 2 patients (0.3%) in the 12-month DAPT group (HR: 1.00; p = 0.999). There were no significant between-group differences in the primary endpoint in 686 patients with acute coronary syndrome (2.4% in both groups; HR: 1.00; p = 0.994) and in 506 patients with diabetes mellitus (2.2% [6-month] vs. 3.3% [12-month]; HR: 0.64; p = 0.428).
conclusionsCompared with 12-month DAPT, 6-month DAPT did not increase the composite events of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or TIMI major bleeding at 1 year in patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation. (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of XIENCE PRIME Stents in Long Lesions [IVUS-XPL Study]; NCT01308281).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.