Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27211893›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2016

Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

S Sujatha, Umesh Jalihal, Yashoda Devi, N Rakesh, Pallavi Chauhan, Shivani Sharma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S SujathaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M S Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSRIT Post, M S R Nagar, Bengaluru, 560 054, India. s_sujathajanardhan@yahoo.com.
Umesh JalihalDepartment of Gastroenterology, M S Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSRIT Post, M S R Nagar, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
Yashoda DeviDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M S Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSRIT Post, M S R Nagar, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
N RakeshDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M S Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSRIT Post, M S R Nagar, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
Pallavi ChauhanDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and Research Centre, Ahead Masuri Canal, NH-24, Masuri, Kakrana, 201 302, India.
Shivani SharmaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M S Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSRIT Post, M S R Nagar, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
M. S. Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls.

methodsUsing a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes.

resultA significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group.

conclusionOral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity.

Indexed as

Hydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMouthAdultFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleMiddle AgedSalivationBuffering capacityGERDOral pHSalivary flow rate

Identifiers

PMID27211893
OpenAlexW2395470012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.