Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27211583›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2016

On Cuteness: Unlocking the Parental Brain and Beyond.

Morten L Kringelbach, Eloise A Stark, Catherine Alexander, Marc H Bornstein, Alan Stein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cute Communication: Can Cute Discourse Be Used in Risk Communication?Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lorenz's classic 'baby schema': a useful biological concept?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The scent of cuteness-neural signatures of infant body odors.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Morten L KringelbachDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK; Center for Music in the Brain (MIB), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: morten.kringelbach@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Eloise A StarkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Catherine AlexanderDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK; Center for Music in the Brain (MIB), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marc H BornsteinEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Suite 8030, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-7971, USA.
Alan SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.

Funding

Child and Family Development across the First Two+ Decades of LifeZIAHD001119 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI BORNSTEIN, MARC H · 2009 to 2019
$20.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD001119Wellcome Trust 090139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuteness in offspring is a potent protective mechanism that ensures survival for otherwise completely dependent infants. Previous research has linked cuteness to early ethological ideas of a 'Kindchenschema' (infant schema) where infant facial features serve as 'innate releasing mechanisms' for instinctual caregiving behaviours. We propose extending the concept of cuteness beyond visual features to include positive infant sounds and smells. Evidence from behavioural and neuroimaging studies links this extended concept of cuteness to simple 'instinctual' behaviours and to caregiving, protection, and complex emotions. We review how cuteness supports key parental capacities by igniting fast privileged neural activity followed by slower processing in large brain networks also involved in play, empathy, and perhaps even higher-order moral emotions.

Indexed as

EmotionsParentsBrainFaceFacial ExpressionHumansMaternal BehaviorParentingPaternal BehavioraffiliativecaregivingemotionKawaiineuroimagingpleasure

Identifiers

PMID27211583
PMCPMC4956347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.