Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27211554›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2016

A Transcriptomic Biomarker to Quantify Systemic Inflammation in Sepsis - A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Diagnostic Study.

Michael Bauer, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Andreas Kortgen, Eva Möller, Karen Felsmann, Jean Marc Cavaillon, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Olivier Rutschmann, Andriy Ruryk, Matthias Kohl and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The cellular basis of organ failure in sepsis-signaling during damage and repair processes.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany; Center for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: michael.bauer@med.uni-jena.de.
Evangelos J Giamarellos-BourboulisCenter for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany; 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University of Athens, Medical School, 1 Rimini Str, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Andreas KortgenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany; Center for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany.
Eva MöllerAnalytik-Jena AG Germany, Sepsis diagnostics expert group (previously SIRS-Lab GmbH Jena), Konrad-Zuse-Strasse 1, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Karen FelsmannAnalytik-Jena AG Germany, Sepsis diagnostics expert group (previously SIRS-Lab GmbH Jena), Konrad-Zuse-Strasse 1, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Jean Marc CavaillonUnit Cytokines & Inflammation, Institute Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otolaryngology and the Institute of Phoniatry and Pedaudiology, Jena University Hospital, Lessingstrasse 2, 07740 Jena, Germany.
Olivier RutschmannDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 2, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Andriy RurykCenter for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany.
Matthias KohlFaculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Furtwangen University, Jakob-Kienzle-Str. 17, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Britta WlotzkaState Development Corporation of Thuringia, Mainzerhofstraße 12, 99084 Erfurt, Germany.
Stefan RußwurmDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany.
John C MarshallUniversity of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Bond 4-014, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany; Center for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEFurtwangen University · DEInstitut Pasteur · FRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of a dysregulated immune response discriminates sepsis from uncomplicated infection. Currently used biomarkers fail to describe simultaneously occurring pro- and anti-inflammatory responses potentially amenable to therapy. Marker candidates were screened by microarray and, after transfer to a platform allowing point-of-care testing, validated in a confirmation set of 246 medical and surgical patients. We identified up-regulated pathways reflecting innate effector mechanisms, while down-regulated pathways related to adaptive lymphocyte functions. A panel of markers composed of three up- (Toll-like receptor 5; Protectin; Clusterin) and 4 down-regulated transcripts (Fibrinogen-like 2; Interleukin-7 receptor; Major histocompatibility complex class II, DP alpha1; Carboxypeptidase, vitellogenic-like) described the magnitude of immune alterations. The created gene expression score was significantly greater in patients with definite as well as with possible/probable infection than with no infection (median (Q25/Q75): 80 (60/101)) and 81 (58/97 vs. 49 (27/66), AUC-ROC=0.812 (95%-CI 0.755-0.869), p<0.0001). Down-regulated lymphocyte markers were associated with prognosis with good sensitivity but limited specificity. Quantifying systemic inflammation by assessment of both pro- and anti-inflammatory innate and adaptive immune responses provides a novel option to identify patients-at-risk and may facilitate immune interventions in sepsis.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenetic MarkersHumansImmunity, InnateOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPoint-of-Care SystemsPrognosisProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisGenetic MarkersAdaptive immunityClinical utilityHost responsePoint-of-careRT-qPCRTranscriptomic profiling

Identifiers

PMID27211554
PMCPMC4856796
OpenAlexW2297361622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.