Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27211518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

MetaTrans: an open-source pipeline for metatranscriptomics.

Xavier Martinez, Marta Pozuelo, Victoria Pascal, David Campos, Ivo Gut, Marta Gut, Fernando Azpiroz, Francisco Guarner, Chaysavanh Manichanh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Multi-Omics Strategies for Investigating the Microbiome in Toxicology Research.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dysbiotic microbes and how to find them: a review of microbiome profiling in prostate cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xavier MartinezDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
Marta PozueloDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
Victoria PascalDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
David CamposDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
Ivo GutCNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
Marta GutCNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
Fernando AzpirozDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
Francisco GuarnerDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
Chaysavanh ManichanhDigestive Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, meta-omic approaches use high-throughput sequencing technologies, which produce a huge amount of data, thus challenging modern computers. Here we present MetaTrans, an efficient open-source pipeline to analyze the structure and functions of active microbial communities using the power of multi-threading computers. The pipeline is designed to perform two types of RNA-Seq analyses: taxonomic and gene expression. It performs quality-control assessment, rRNA removal, maps reads against functional databases and also handles differential gene expression analysis. Its efficacy was validated by analyzing data from synthetic mock communities, data from a previous study and data generated from twelve human fecal samples. Compared to an existing web application server, MetaTrans shows more efficiency in terms of runtime (around 2 hours per million of transcripts) and presents adapted tools to compare gene expression levels. It has been tested with a human gut microbiome database but also proposes an option to use a general database in order to analyze other ecosystems. For the installation and use of the pipeline, we provide a detailed guide at the following website (www.metatrans.org).

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaComputational BiologyFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInternetMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27211518
PMCPMC4876386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.