Trial reportPatient education and counseling2016
A motivational interviewing-based counseling intervention to increase postabortion uptake of contraception: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Harms of Contraceptive Counseling and Provision Interventions for Women : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn't?BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2020Pooled it
- Contraceptive Counseling in Clinical Settings: An Updated Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Theory-based interventions for contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Promoting long-acting reversible contraception among post-abortion clients with a provider-comparison intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Nepal.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Motivational interviewing for family planning and reducing risky sexual behavior among incarcerated men nearing release: A randomized controlled pilot study.Psychological services · 2023Trial
- Motivational interviewing to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth: A randomized controlled pilot study.Psychological services · 2022Trial
- Computer-assisted motivational interviewing for contraceptive use in women leaving prison: A randomized controlled trial.Contraception · 2020Trial
- Incorporating Black women's perspectives into long-acting reversible contraception implementation.F&S reports · 2022Article
- Developing contraceptive services for immigrant women postpartum - a case study of a quality improvement collaborative in Sweden.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Leveraging the Client-Provider Interaction to Address Contraceptive Discontinuation: A Scoping Review of the Evidence That Links Them.Global health, science and practice · 2021Article
- Impact of contraceptive counseling on Texans who can and cannot receive no-cost post-abortion contraception.Contraception · 2021Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes About Sterilization and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Women's post-abortion contraceptive use: Are predictors the same for immediate and future uptake of contraception? Evidence from Ghana.PloS one · 2021Article
- Motivational interviewing to promote long-acting reversible contraception among Rwandan couples wishing to prevent or delay pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Prevalence and correlates of postabortion long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young women (24 and below) in Nepal: Strategy in the search for improvements.Reproductive health · 2019Article
- Shared negative experiences of long-acting reversible contraception and their influence on contraceptive decision-making: a multi-methods study.Contraception · 2019Article
- Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy.Contraception · 2018Article
- Correlates of long-acting reversible contraception uptake among rural women in Guatemala.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine if a counseling intervention using the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) would impact uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) after abortion.
methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing an MI-based contraception counseling intervention to only non-standardized counseling. Sixty women 15-29 years-old were randomized. PRIMARY OUTCOME: uptake of LARC within four weeks of abortion. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: uptake of any effective contraceptive, contraceptive use three months after abortion and satisfaction with counseling. Bivariate analysis was used to compare outcomes.
resultsIn the intervention arm, 65.5% of participants received a long-acting method within four weeks compared to 32.3% in the control arm (p=0.01). Three months after the abortion, differences in LARC use endured (60.0% vs. 30.8%, p=0.05). Uptake and use of any effective method were not statistically different. More women in the intervention arm reported satisfaction with their counseling than women in the control arm (92.0% vs. 65.4%, p=0.04).
conclusionTwice as many women in the MI-based contraception counseling intervention initiated and continued to use LARC compared to women who received only non-standardized counseling. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A contraception counseling session using the principles and skills of motivational interviewing has the potential to impact LARC use after abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.