Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27211041›Full record

ReviewTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2016

Enhancing the efficacy of engraftment of cord blood for hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Hal E Broxmeyer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ex Vivo Expansion and Homing of Human Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stabilizing hematopoietic stem cells in vitro.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. mCell research · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Enhancement of stem cell engraftment on a WHIM.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hal E BroxmeyerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Electronic address: hbroxmey@iupui.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Project-005U54DK106846 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Reuben Kapur, Karen Elizabeth Pollok · 2015 to 2026
$9.7M
BASIC SCIENCE STUDIES ON GENE THERAPY OF BLOOD DISEASEST32HL007910 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Roland W. Herzog, Reuben Kapur · 1999 to 2026
$7.6M
REGULATION OF HEMATOPOIETIC CELL PRODUCTIONT32DK007519 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI KAPLAN, MARK H · 1986 to 2020
$7.1M
MECHANISMS OF SYNERGISTIC REGULATION OF STEM/PROGENITORSR01HL056416 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 1996 to 2017
$6.0M
Cytokine Enhancement of Myeloid Progenitor Cell SurvivalR01HL067384 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 2001 to 2014
$4.6M
Regulating hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoiesis for clinical efficacyP30DK090948 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E., SROUR, EDWARD F · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
Enhancing Engraftment of Cord Blood by CD26 InhibitionR01HL112669 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E., FARAG, SHERIF S · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056416NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067384NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112669NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007910NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK090948NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007519NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical cord blood (CB) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has progressed well since the initial successful CB HCT that saved the life of a young boy with Fanconi anemia. The recipient is alive and well now 28 years out since that first transplant with CB cells from his HLA-matched sister. CB HCT has now been used to treat over 35,000 patients with various malignant and non-malignant disorders mainly using HLA-matched or partially HLA-disparate allogeneic CB cells. There are advantages and disadvantages to using CB for HCT compared to other sources of transplantable hematopoietic stem (HSC) and progenitor (HPC) cells. One disadvantage of the use of CB as a source of transplantable HSC and HPC is the limited number of these cells in a single CB collected, and slower time to neutrophil, platelet and immune cell recovery. This review describes current attempts to: increase the collection of HSC/HPC from CB, enhance the homing of the infused cells, ex-vivo expand numbers of collected HSC/HPC and increase production of the infused CB cells that reach the marrow. The ultimate goal is to manipulate efficiency and efficacy for safe and economical use of single unit CB HCT.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFanconi AnemiaFemaleGraft Enhancement, ImmunologicHumansMaleCord bloodCord blood collectionDipeptidylpeptidase 4Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cellsOxygen tension

Identifiers

PMID27211041
PMCPMC4899263
OpenAlexW2372908172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.