Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27210753›Full record

ArticleCell reports2016

Leader Cells Define Directionality of Trunk, but Not Cranial, Neural Crest Cell Migration.

Jo Richardson, Anton Gauert, Luis Briones Montecinos, Lucía Fanlo, Zainalabdeen Mohmammed Alhashem, Rodrigo Assar, Elisa Marti, Alexandre Kabla, Steffen Härtel, Claudia Linker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Collective migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Self-generated chemotaxis of mixed cell populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. From neural crest migration to the onset of gangliogenesis.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quantitative Analysis of Directional Neural Crest Cell Migration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jo RichardsonRandall Division of Cell & Molecular Biophysics, King's College, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Anton GauertRandall Division of Cell & Molecular Biophysics, King's College, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Luis Briones MontecinosLaboratory for Scientific Image Analysis (SCIAN-Lab), Biomedical Neuroscience Institute (BNI), Centre for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine (CIMT), ICBM, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 1058, Chile.
Lucía FanloInstituto de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Parc Cientific de Barcelona, C/Baldiri i Reixac 15-21, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Zainalabdeen Mohmammed AlhashemRandall Division of Cell & Molecular Biophysics, King's College, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Rodrigo AssarICBM Human Genetics Program, Centre for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine (CIMT), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 1058, Chile.
Elisa MartiInstituto de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Parc Cientific de Barcelona, C/Baldiri i Reixac 15-21, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Alexandre KablaEngineering Department, Cambridge University, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Steffen HärtelLaboratory for Scientific Image Analysis (SCIAN-Lab), Biomedical Neuroscience Institute (BNI), Centre for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine (CIMT), ICBM, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 1058, Chile.
Claudia LinkerRandall Division of Cell & Molecular Biophysics, King's College, London SE1 1UL, UK. Electronic address: claudia.linker@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000080Medical Research Council MRC G1000080/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective cell migration is fundamental for life and a hallmark of cancer. Neural crest (NC) cells migrate collectively, but the mechanisms governing this process remain controversial. Previous analyses in Xenopus indicate that cranial NC (CNC) cells are a homogeneous population relying on cell-cell interactions for directional migration, while chick embryo analyses suggest a heterogeneous population with leader cells instructing directionality. Our data in chick and zebrafish embryos show that CNC cells do not require leader cells for migration and all cells present similar migratory capacities. In contrast, laser ablation of trunk NC (TNC) cells shows that leader cells direct movement and cell-cell contacts are required for migration. Moreover, leader and follower identities are acquired before the initiation of migration and remain fixed thereafter. Thus, two distinct mechanisms establish the directionality of CNC cells and TNC cells. This implies the existence of multiple molecular mechanisms for collective cell migration.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCell CommunicationCell DivisionCell ShapeChickensNeural CrestSkullTorsoXenopus laevisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID27210753
PMCPMC4893160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.