ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2016
Phylogenetic Relationship and Secondary Metabolite Production of Marine Fungi Producing the Cyclodepsipeptides Scopularide A and B.
Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Proteomic Analysis of Anti-Cancerous Scopularide Production by a Marine Microascus brevicaulis Strain and Its UV Mutant.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strains originally affiliated to the genera Scopulariopsis and Microascus were compared regarding the scopularide production in order to investigate their ability to produce the cyclodepsipeptides and select the best suited candidate for subsequent optimisation processes. Phylogenetic calculations using available sequences of the genera Scopulariopsis and Microascus revealed that most of the sequences clustered within two closely related groups, comprising mainly Scopulariopsis/Microascus brevicaulis and Microascus sp., respectively. Interestingly, high yields of scopularide A were exhibited by three strains belonging to S./M. brevicaulis, while lower titres were observed for two strains of Microascus sp. Close phylogenetic distances within and between the two groups supported the proposed combination of both genera into one holomorph group. Short phylogenetic distances did not allow a clear affiliation at the species level on the basis of ribosomal DNA sequences, especially for Microascus sp. strains. Additionally, several sequences originating from strains assigned to Scopulariopsis exhibited a polyphyletic nature. The production pattern is in accordance with the phylogenetic position of the strains and significant production of scopularide B could only be observed for the S./M. brevicaulis strain LF580. Thus, the phylogenetic position marks the biotechnologically interesting strains and matters in optimisation strategies. In conclusion, the ability of all five strains to produce at least one of the scopularides suggests a distribution of the responsible gene cluster within the holomorph group. Setting the focus on the production of the cyclodepsipeptides, strain LF580 represents the best candidate for further strain and process optimisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27209381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.