Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27209279›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

DNetDB: The human disease network database based on dysfunctional regulation mechanism.

Jing Yang, Su-Juan Wu, Shao-You Yang, Jia-Wei Peng, Shi-Nuo Wang, Fu-Yan Wang, Yu-Xing Song, Ting Qi, Yi-Xue Li, Yuan-Yuan Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exploring novel disease-disease associations based on multi-view fusion network.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jing YangShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Su-Juan WuShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Shao-You YangShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Jia-Wei PengShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Shi-Nuo WangShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Fu-Yan WangShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Yu-Xing SongShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Ting QiShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China.
Yi-Xue LiShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China. yxli@scbit.org.
Yuan-Yuan LiShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, 200235, P.R. China. yyli@scbit.org.
Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute · CNShanghai Center For Bioinformation Technology · CNCenter for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science · CNShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease similarity study provides new insights into disease taxonomy, pathogenesis, which plays a guiding role in diagnosis and treatment. The early studies were limited to estimate disease similarities based on clinical manifestations, disease-related genes, medical vocabulary concepts or registry data, which were inevitably biased to well-studied diseases and offered small chance of discovering novel findings in disease relationships. In other words, genome-scale expression data give us another angle to address this problem since simultaneous measurement of the expression of thousands of genes allows for the exploration of gene transcriptional regulation, which is believed to be crucial to biological functions. Although differential expression analysis based methods have the potential to explore new disease relationships, it is difficult to unravel the upstream dysregulation mechanisms of diseases. We therefore estimated disease similarities based on gene expression data by using differential coexpression analysis, a recently emerging method, which has been proved to be more potential to capture dysfunctional regulation mechanisms than differential expression analysis. A total of 1,326 disease relationships among 108 diseases were identified, and the relevant information constituted the human disease network database (DNetDB). Benefiting from the use of differential coexpression analysis, the potential common dysfunctional regulation mechanisms shared by disease pairs (i.e. disease relationships) were extracted and presented. Statistical indicators, common disease-related genes and drugs shared by disease pairs were also included in DNetDB. In total, 1,326 disease relationships among 108 diseases, 5,598 pathways, 7,357 disease-related genes and 342 disease drugs are recorded in DNetDB, among which 3,762 genes and 148 drugs are shared by at least two diseases. DNetDB is the first database focusing on disease similarity from the viewpoint of gene regulation mechanism. It provides an easy-to-use web interface to search and browse the disease relationships and thus helps to systematically investigate etiology and pathogenesis, perform drug repositioning, and design novel therapeutic interventions.Database URL: http://app.scbit.org/DNetDB/ #.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyDiseaseGene Expression ProfilingHumansDifferential coexpression analysisDifferential regulationDisease similarityDysfunctional regulation mechanismHuman disease network

Identifiers

PMID27209279
PMCPMC4875653
OpenAlexW2399571647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.