Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27209163›Full record

ReviewBMC neurology2016

Iranian consensus on use of vitamin D in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Mansoureh Togha, Behnaz Sedighi, Vahid Shayegannejad, Alireza Nickseresht, Shahriar Nafissi, Niayesh Mohebbi, Nastran Majdinasab, Mohsen Foroughipour and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Soodeh Razeghi JahromiMS Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Ali SahraianMS Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. msahrai@sina.tums.ac.ir.
Mansoureh ToghaDepartment of Neurology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behnaz SedighiShafa Hospital, Medical Sciences University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Vahid ShayegannejadDepartment of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza NicksereshtDepartment of Neurology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shahriar NafissiDepartment of Neurology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Niayesh MohebbiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nastran MajdinasabDepartment of Neurology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Mohsen ForoughipourDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Masoud EtemadifarDepartment of Neurology, Azahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Nahid Beladi MoghadamDepartment of Neurology, Imam Hossein Hospital, Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hormoz AyramlouDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fereshteh AshtariDepartment of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shekoofe AlaieMS Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRImam Hossein Hospital · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRNamazi Hospital · IRNational Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute · IRShariati Hospital · IRSina Hospital · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulating evidences from experimental, epidemiologic and clinical studies support the potential linkage between poor vitamin D status and the risk of developing Multiple Sclerosis (MS), as well as, an adverse disease course. However, the results of the trials on the clinical outcomes of vitamin D supplementation in MS patients are less consistent which brought many discrepancies in routine practice. In this article we presented a summary of a symposium on vitamin D and MS. In this symposium we aim to review the current data about the relationship between vitamin D and MS, and suggest management guides for practicing neurologists. DISCUSSION: Generally, supplementation seems to be reasonable for all MS and clinically isolated syndrome (Rinaldi et al., Toxins 7:129-37, 2015) patients with serum 25(OH)D level below 40 ng/ml. In patients with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, a large replacing dose (e.g. 50,000 IU capsules of D per week for 8-12 week) is recommended. Panel also suggested: the checking of the serum vitamin D, and calcium level, as well as, patients' compliance after the initial phase; a maintenance treatment of 1500-2000 IU daily or equivalent intermittent (weekly, biweekly or monthly) Dose, considering the patient's compliance; routine check of serum vitamin D level at least two times a year especially at the beginning of spring and autumn; Serum vitamin D evaluation for first degree relatives of MS patients at high risk age and supplementation in case of insufficiency (25(OH)D less than 40 ng/ml); correction of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency before pregnancy, as well as, a daily dose of 1500-2000 IU or equivalent biweekly intake in 2nd and 3rd trimesters; stopping supplementation if 25(OH)D serum level exceeds 100 ng/ml. Although the results of high power studies are not available, correcting vitamin D status seems plausible in all MS and CIS patients. Maintaining the serum 25(OH)D level between 40 and 100 ng/ml is not known to exert adverse effect. More ever, it might be associated with lower disease activity.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansIranMultiple SclerosisPregnancyVitamin DVitamin DAssessmentEtiologyMultiple sclerosisPathogenesisTreatmentVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID27209163
PMCPMC4875642
OpenAlexW2398678185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.