ReviewMolecular and biochemical parasitology2016
Bacterial tweets and podcasts #signaling#eavesdropping#microbialfightclub.
Review in Molecular and biochemical parasitology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and six opportunistic pathogens cover a broad spectrum from mutualism to antagonism.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018Review
- Interkingdom microbial consortia mechanisms to guide biotechnological applications.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Review
- Acyl-homoserine-lactones receptor LuxR ofJournal of food science and technology · 2018Article
- Activation of Vibrio cholerae quorum sensing promotes survival of an arthropod host.Nature microbiology · 2018Article
- The MyxobacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Once thought to live independently, bacteria are now known to be highly social organisms. Their behaviors ranges from cooperatively forming complex multispecies communities to fiercely competing for resources. Work over the past fifty years has shown that bacteria communicate through diverse mechanisms, such as exchanging diffusible molecules, exporting molecules in membrane vesicles, and interacting through direct cell-cell contact. These methods allow bacteria to sense and respond to other cells around them and coordinate group behavior. In this review, we share the discoveries and lessons learned in the field of bacterial communication with the aim of providing insights to parasitologists and other researchers working on related questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.