Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208764›Full record

ReviewInfectious disease clinics of North America2016

Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in the Community: Trends and Lessons Learned.

David van Duin, David L Paterson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious disease clinics of North America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 271 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
271citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

271 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 560 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

211 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David van DuinDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, CB 7030, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: david_vanduin@med.unc.edu.
David L PatersonThe University of Queensland, Building 71/918 RBWH, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniaeR21AI114508 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A., VAN DUIN, DAVID · 2015 to 2016
$445k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI114508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria are one of the most important threats to public health. Typically, MDR bacteria are associated with nosocomial infections. However, some MDR bacteria have become prevalent causes of community-acquired infections. The spread of MDR bacteria into the community is a crucial development, and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, health care costs, and antibiotic use. Factors associated with community dissemination of MDR bacteria overlap but are distinct from those associated with nosocomial spread. Prevention of further community spread of MDR bacteria is of the utmost importance, and requires a multidisciplinary approach involving all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialPublic HealthAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenem-resistant EnterobacteriaceaeKlebsiella pneumoniaeReadmissionTigecyclineTransmission

Identifiers

PMID27208764
PMCPMC5314345
OpenAlexW2405903593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.