Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208508›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2016

Identification of human RNA editing sites: A historical perspective.

Gokul Ramaswami, Jin Billy Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Atlas of glomerular disease-specific genetic effects on blood transcriptome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Multi-Tissue Genetic Regulation of RNA Editing in Pigs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Phylogenetic and structural analysis of Hydra ADAR.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Regulation and functions of non-mNature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gokul RamaswamiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Program in Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: GRamaswami@mednet.ucla.edu.
Jin Billy LiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: jin.billy.li@stanford.edu.

Funding

Profiling and Dissecting the Dynamic Regulation of RNA EditingR01GM102484 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIN BILLY · 2013 to 2021
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A-to-I RNA editing is an essential gene regulatory mechanism. Once thought to be a rare phenomenon only occurring in a few transcripts, the emergence of high-throughput RNA sequencing has facilitated the identification of over 2 million RNA editing sites in the human transcriptome. In this review, we survey the current RNA-seq based methods as well as historical methods used to identify RNA editing sites.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRNA EditingSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomePost-transcriptional gene regulationRNA editingRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27208508
PMCPMC5014717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.