Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208329›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2016

Exclusion of Women of Childbearing Potential in Clinical Trials of Type 2 Diabetes Medications: A Review of Protocol-Based Barriers to Enrollment.

Alannah L Phelan, Allen R Kunselman, Cynthia H Chuang, Nazia T Raja-Khan, Richard S Legro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alannah L PhelanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Allen R KunselmanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Cynthia H ChuangDepartment of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Nazia T Raja-KhanDepartment of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Richard S LegroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA rsl1@psu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWomen of childbearing potential are often excluded from participating in clinical trials owing to concerns about adverse fetal effects of treatment. This study aims to determine the prevalence of fertility-related exclusion criteria in clinical trials of type 2 diabetes medications and to determine whether these criteria are commensurate with drug risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsClinicalTrials.gov was queried for trials of type 2 diabetes medications that were phase 2 or 3, were based in the U.S., and enrolled participants 18-40 years old. Six hundred eighty-eight trials met criteria. Information collected about each trial included enrollment, trial length, exclusion and inclusion criteria, trial sponsor, and pregnancy category of drug(s) administered.

resultsMost studies (59%) included one or more fertility-related exclusion criteria, most often excluding current pregnancy (55%) and breast-feeding (44%). Trials of medications with increased fetal risk were not more restrictive: trials of category C drugs (evidence of fetal risks in animals) were less likely to exclude pregnancy compared with trials of category B drugs (no known human or animal fetal risks) (45.6% vs. 69.8%, odds ratio [OR] 0.37 [95% CI 0.20, 0.65], P = 0.0005) or to require contraceptive use (29.9% vs. 57.1%, OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.18, 0.56], P = 0.001).

conclusionsIn clinical trials of type 2 diabetes medications, exclusion criteria affecting women of childbearing potential are often disproportionate to risk to the participant and fetus. These criteria have the potential to impede young women's access to clinical trials and may hinder the acquisition of clinical knowledge critical for improving the care of women with diabetes.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingFetusClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicContraceptive AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Eligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsOdds RatioPregnancyContraceptive AgentsHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27208329
PMCPMC4878221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.