Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208315›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2016

Activation of PKR by short stem-loop RNAs containing single-stranded arms.

Christopher B Mayo, C Jason Wong, Prisma E Lopez, Jeffrey W Lary, James L Cole

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecular Mechanisms of Innate Immune Sensing of Exogenous RNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Activation of PKR by a short-hairpin RNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mucosal immunity and tRNA, tRF, and tiRNA.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher B MayoDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.
C Jason WongDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.
Prisma E LopezDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.
Jeffrey W LaryNational Analytical Ultracentrifugation Facility, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.
James L ColeDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA National Analytical Ultracentrifugation Facility, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9028-8364
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Mechanism for Activation of the Antiviral Kinase PKRR01AI053615 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI COLE, JAMES L · 2004 to 2016
$3.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI053615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein kinase R (PKR) is a central component of the innate immunity antiviral pathway and is activated by dsRNA. PKR contains a C-terminal kinase domain and two tandem dsRNA binding domains. In the canonical activation model, binding of multiple PKR monomers to dsRNA enhances dimerization of the kinase domain, leading to enzymatic activation. A minimal dsRNA of 30 bp is required for activation. However, short (∼15 bp) stem-loop RNAs containing flanking single-stranded tails (ss-dsRNAs) are capable of activating PKR. Activation was reported to require a 5'-triphosphate. Here, we characterize the structural features of ss-dsRNAs that contribute to activation. We have designed a model ss-dsRNA containing 15-nt single-stranded tails and a 15-bp stem and made systematic truncations of the tail and stem regions. Autophosphorylation assays and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments were used to correlate activation and binding affinity. PKR activation requires both 5'- and 3'-single-stranded tails but the triphosphate is dispensable. Activation potency and binding affinity decrease as the ssRNA tails are truncated and activation is abolished in cases where the binding affinity is strongly reduced. These results indicate that the single-stranded regions bind to PKR and support a model where ss-dsRNA induced dimerization is required but not sufficient to activate the kinase. The length of the duplex regions in several natural RNA activators of PKR is below the minimum of 30 bp required for activation and similar interactions with single-stranded regions may contribute to PKR activation in these cases.

Indexed as

DimerizationeIF-2 KinaseEnzyme ActivationRNA, Double-StrandedeIF-2 KinaseRNA, Double-StrandeddsRNAinnate immunityPKRprotein kinase

Identifiers

PMID27208315
PMCPMC4911914
OpenAlexW2402760448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.