Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208240›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2016

Gains and Losses of Cis-regulatory Elements Led to Divergence of the Arabidopsis APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER Duplicate Genes in the Time, Space, and Level of Expression and Regulation of One Paralog by the Other.

Lingling Ye, Bin Wang, Wengen Zhang, Hongyan Shan, Hongzhi Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-wide analysis ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond the Genetic Pathways, Flowering Regulation Complexity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lingling YeState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z., H.S., H.K.); andUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z.).ORCID 0000-0003-3834-862X
Bin WangState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z., H.S., H.K.); andUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z.).
Wengen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z., H.S., H.K.); andUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z.).ORCID 0000-0003-0946-8614
Hongyan ShanState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z., H.S., H.K.); andUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z.) shanhongyan@ibcas.ac.cn hzkong@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-2935
Hongzhi KongState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z., H.S., H.K.); andUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (L.Y., B.W., W.Z.) shanhongyan@ibcas.ac.cn hzkong@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-0510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How genes change their expression patterns over time is still poorly understood. Here, by conducting expression, functional, bioinformatic, and evolutionary analyses, we demonstrate that the differences between the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) APETALA1 (AP1) and CAULIFLOWER (CAL) duplicate genes in the time, space, and level of expression were determined by the presence or absence of functionally important transcription factor-binding sites (TFBSs) in regulatory regions. In particular, a CArG box, which is the autoregulatory site of AP1 that can also be bound by the CAL protein, is a key determinant of the expression differences. Because of the CArG box, AP1 is both autoregulated and cross-regulated (by AP1 and CAL, respectively), and its relatively high-level expression is maintained till to the late stages of sepal and petal development. The observation that the CArG box was gained recently further suggests that the autoregulation and cross-regulation of AP1, as well as its function in sepal and petal development, are derived features. By comparing the evolutionary histories of this and other TFBSs, we further indicate that the divergence of AP1 and CAL in regulatory regions has been markedly asymmetric and can be divided into several stages. Specifically, shortly after duplication, when AP1 happened to be the paralog that maintained the function of the ancestral gene, CAL experienced certain degrees of degenerate evolution, in which several functionally important TFBSs were lost. Later, when functional divergence allowed the survival of both paralogs, CAL remained largely unchanged in expression, whereas the functions of AP1 were gradually reinforced by gains of the CArG box and other TFBSs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, DuplicateArabidopsis ProteinsBase SequenceBinding SitesEvolution, MolecularMADS Domain ProteinsProtein BindingRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTime FactorsTranscription FactorsAP1 protein, ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCAL protein, ArabidopsisMADS Domain ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27208240
PMCPMC4902614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.