Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208237›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2016

X-Ray Computed Tomography Reveals the Response of Root System Architecture to Soil Texture.

Eric D Rogers, Daria Monaenkova, Medhavinee Mijar, Apoorva Nori, Daniel I Goldman, Philip N Benfey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An improved U-Net-basedFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent trends in root phenomics of plant systems with available methods- discrepancies and consonances.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric D RogersDepartment of Biology (E.D.R., M.M., P.N.B.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P.N.B.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; andSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 (D.M., A.N., D.I.G.).
Daria MonaenkovaDepartment of Biology (E.D.R., M.M., P.N.B.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P.N.B.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; andSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 (D.M., A.N., D.I.G.).
Medhavinee MijarDepartment of Biology (E.D.R., M.M., P.N.B.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P.N.B.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; andSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 (D.M., A.N., D.I.G.).
Apoorva NoriDepartment of Biology (E.D.R., M.M., P.N.B.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P.N.B.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; andSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 (D.M., A.N., D.I.G.).ORCID 0000-0001-8231-0536
Daniel I GoldmanDepartment of Biology (E.D.R., M.M., P.N.B.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P.N.B.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; andSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 (D.M., A.N., D.I.G.).
Philip N BenfeyDepartment of Biology (E.D.R., M.M., P.N.B.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P.N.B.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; andSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 (D.M., A.N., D.I.G.) philip.benfey@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5302-758X
Georgia Institute of Technology · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root system architecture (RSA) impacts plant fitness and crop yield by facilitating efficient nutrient and water uptake from the soil. A better understanding of the effects of soil on RSA could improve crop productivity by matching roots to their soil environment. We used x-ray computed tomography to perform a detailed three-dimensional quantification of changes in rice (Oryza sativa) RSA in response to the physical properties of a granular substrate. We characterized the RSA of eight rice cultivars in five different growth substrates and determined that RSA is the result of interactions between genotype and growth environment. We identified cultivar-specific changes in RSA in response to changing growth substrate texture. The cultivar Azucena exhibited low RSA plasticity in all growth substrates, whereas cultivar Bala root depth was a function of soil hardness. Our imaging techniques provide a framework to study RSA in different growth environments, the results of which can be used to improve root traits with agronomic potential.

Indexed as

DroughtsGene-Environment InteractionGenotypeOryzaPlant RootsSoilTomography, X-Ray ComputedSoil

Identifiers

PMID27208237
PMCPMC4936573
OpenAlexW2396902692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.