Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27208079›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2016

Editor's Highlight: Analysis of the Effects of Cell Stress and Cytotoxicity on In Vitro Assay Activity Across a Diverse Chemical and Assay Space.

Richard Judson, Keith Houck, Matt Martin, Ann M Richard, Thomas B Knudsen, Imran Shah, Stephen Little, John Wambaugh, R Woodrow Setzer, Parth Kothiya and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multimodal Cross-Attentive Graph-Based Framework for Predicting In Vivo Endocrine Disruptors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bioactivity of the ubiquitous tire preservative 6PPD and degradant, 6PPD-quinone in fish- and mammalian-based assays.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Gaining confidence inNAM journal · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Richard Judson*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Judson.richard@epa.gov.
Keith Houck*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Matt Martin*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Ann M Richard*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Thomas B Knudsen*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Imran Shah*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Stephen Little*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
John Wambaugh*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
R Woodrow Setzer*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Parth KothiyaContractor to the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Jimmy PhuongContractor to the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Dayne FilerORISE Fellow at the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Doris Smith*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
David ReifDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Daniel RotroffDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Nicole KleinstreuerILS/NICEATM, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Nisha SipesNational Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Menghang XiaNIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Rockville, Maryland.
Ruili HuangNIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Rockville, Maryland.
Kevin Crofton*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Russell S Thomas*U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

Funding

Toxicology in the 21st Century Program (Tox21) - Systems ToxicologyZIATR000038 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI XIA, MENGHANG · 2015 to 2025
$5.7M
Toxicology in the 21st Century Program (Tox21) - Computational ToxicologyZIATR000040 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI HUANG, RUILI · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical toxicity can arise from disruption of specific biomolecular functions or through more generalized cell stress and cytotoxicity-mediated processes. Here, responses of 1060 chemicals including pharmaceuticals, natural products, pesticidals, consumer, and industrial chemicals across a battery of 815 in vitro assay endpoints from 7 high-throughput assay technology platforms were analyzed in order to distinguish between these types of activities. Both cell-based and cell-free assays showed a rapid increase in the frequency of responses at concentrations where cell stress/cytotoxicity responses were observed in cell-based assays. Chemicals that were positive on at least 2 viability/cytotoxicity assays within the concentration range tested (typically up to 100 μM) activated a median of 12% of assay endpoints whereas those that were not cytotoxic in this concentration range activated 1.3% of the assays endpoints. The results suggest that activity can be broadly divided into: (1) specific biomolecular interactions against one or more targets (eg, receptors or enzymes) at concentrations below which overt cytotoxicity-associated activity is observed; and (2) activity associated with cell stress or cytotoxicity, which may result from triggering specific cell stress pathways, chemical reactivity, physico-chemical disruption of proteins or membranes, or broad low-affinity non-covalent interactions. Chemicals showing a greater number of specific biomolecular interactions are generally designed to be bioactive (pharmaceuticals or pesticidal active ingredients), whereas intentional food-use chemicals tended to show the fewest specific interactions. The analyses presented here provide context for use of these data in ongoing studies to predict in vivo toxicity from chemicals lacking extensive hazard assessment.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalBiological AssayHumansIn Vitro TechniquesToxicity Testscell stresscytotoxicityhigh-throughput screeningIn vitrooxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID27208079
PMCPMC6280881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.