Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27207965›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Initiation and Dose Uptitration in Children With Cardiovascular Disease: A Retrospective Review of Standard Clinical Practice and a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

S Lucy Roche, Kathryn Timberlake, Cedric Manlhiot, Mervin Balasingam, Judith Wilson, Kristen George, Brian W McCrindle, Paul F Kantor

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00742040 (Rapid Versus Prolonged Inpatient Up-Titration of Captopril), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00742040 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Rapid Versus Prolonged Inpatient Up-Titration of Captopril: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2008 to 2009Enrolled50ConditionsHeart DiseaseArmsCaptopril
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Congenital Heart Disease: The State-of-the-Art on Its Pharmacological Therapeutics.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S Lucy RocheDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada The Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Kathryn TimberlakeFaculty of Pharmacy, Univeristy of Toronto, Canada The Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Cedric ManlhiotDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada The Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Mervin BalasingamThe Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Judith WilsonThe Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Kristen GeorgeThe Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Brian W McCrindleDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada The Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Paul F KantorDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada The Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada paul.kantor@albertahealthservices.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are a mainstay of medical management in pediatric cardiology. However, there are no data defining how best to initiate and uptitrate the dose of these medications in children. METHODS AND

resultsRetrospective chart review revealed only 24% of our pediatric cardiology inpatients were discharged on predefined optimal doses of ACEIs and few underwent further dose uptitration in the 8 weeks after hospital discharge. Therefore, 2 alternative protocols for initiation of captopril were compared in a prospective randomized clinical trial. A "rapid uptitration" protocol reached an optimal dose on day 3, whereas the alternative, "prolonged uptitration" protocol, reached an optimal dose on day 9. Forty-6 patients (54% male) were recruited to the trial, with a median age of 0.7 year (IQR 0.5-2.3 years). Captopril was initiated while in intensive care in 39% of patients and on the cardiology ward in 61%. There were no differences between the protocols in episodes of hypotension, symptomatic hypotension, or indices of renal function. Patients following the rapid protocol reached higher doses of captopril (0.93±0.24 versus 0.57±0.38 mg/kg per dose, P<0.0001) and were more likely to have achieved the predefined target (88% versus 43%, P=0.002) and optimal ACEI doses (80% versus 29%, P=0.001) before discharge.

conclusionsA protocol of rapid ACEI dose uptitration for infants and children with cardiovascular disease can be introduced safely, even in patients receiving intensive care therapy. Compared with standard clinical practice or with a more prolonged protocol, rapid ACEI dose uptitration achieves a higher dosage in this population with no evident disadvantages. CLINICAL

trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00742040.

Indexed as

AdolescentAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCaptoprilCardiomyopathy, DilatedCardiovascular DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart FailureHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCaptoprilcongenitaldrugsheart defectsheart failurepediatrics

Identifiers

PMID27207965
PMCPMC4889193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.