ArticleTobacco control2017
Support for electronic cigarette regulations among California voters.
Article in Tobacco control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Public support for policies to regulate flavoured tobacco and e-cigarette products in rural California.Tobacco control · 2023Article
- Article
- Examining the association between California tobacco licensed retail density and public support or opposition to state anti-tobacco legislation.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2023Article
- Support for Aggressive Tobacco Control Interventions Among California Adolescents and Young Adults.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020Article
- Public Support for E-Cigarette-related Policies among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.Tobacco use insights · 2020Article
- The Effect of E-cigarette Commercials on Youth Smoking: A Prospective Study.American journal of health behavior · 2019Article
- Relationship between social media engagement and e-cigarette policy support.Addictive behaviors reports · 2019Article
- Speaking up about Lighting up in Public: Examining Psychosocial Correlates of Smoking and Vaping Assertive Communication Intentions among U.S. Adults.Health communication · 2019Article
- Support for e-cigarette regulations among Australian young adults.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Positive perceptions of electronic cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes are associated with weaker support for endgame policies on combustible cigarettes: A population-based cross-sectional study in Hong Kong.Tobacco induced diseases · 2019Article
- Attitudes Toward FDA Regulation of Newly Deemed Tobacco Products.Tobacco regulatory science · 2017Article
- Public Support for Electronic Cigarette Regulation in Hong Kong: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Policies regulating the sale and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) vary widely within the USA and worldwide. We assessed support for four proposed policies among a representative sample of California voters (N=1002) and identified latent classes of voters who were likely to support or oppose various policies. Findings showed support for prohibiting e-cigarette use where smoking is banned (70%), taxing e-cigarettes (74%), licensing e-cigarette retailers (74%), and restricting flavourings (57%). Correlates of policy support included smoking status, political orientation, age group and California region. The latent class analysis revealed three classes of voters: Policy Supporters (predominantly college-educated, higher-income, liberal non-smokers), Policy Opposers (predominantly low-educated, low-income, conservative smokers), and Swing Voters (intermediate levels of education, income, and smoking, conservative). Findings provide information to inform segmented state-based communication campaigns regarding regulation of e-cigarettes. If policymakers want to enact prohibitive state-level policies, Opposers and Swing Voters may be important constituents to target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.