SynthesisAcupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society2016
Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05926752 (Photobiomodulation Therapy for Myofascial Pelvic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Photobiomodulation Therapy for Myofascial Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Study
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of photobiomodulation on pain and quality of life in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review.Lasers in medical science · 2026Pooled it
- High-intensity laser therapy in low back pain management: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2023Pooled it
- 4-Week Comparative Outcomes of Standard Physiotherapy, Balneotherapy Plus Physiotherapy and Dextrose Prolotherapy in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Non-Randomized Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of home-based low-level laser therapy in patients with low back pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- Effects of 36.5 Hz pulsed LASER acupuncture on pain and disease impact in fibromyalgia patients: A pilot randomized clinical trial.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Trial
- Comparison of low-level laser therapy versus neuromuscular electrical nerve stimulation at hemiplegic shoulder pain and upper extremity functions.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
- Is Shock Wave Application Effective on Various Chronic Wounds in the Geriatric Population? Preliminary Clinical Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Trial
- Combined Rehabilitation with Alpha Lipoic Acid, Acetyl-L-Carnitine, Resveratrol, and Cholecalciferolin Discogenic Sciatica in Young People: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Discogenic Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Trial
- Efficacy of invasive laser acupuncture in treating chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2022Trial
- Laser photobiomodulation is more effective than ultrasound therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a comparative study.Lasers in medical science · 2019Trial
- Effect of laser treatment on postural control parameters in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Photobiomodulation for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: therapeutic effects and molecular mechanism.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The 28-year evolution of laser acupuncture: a CiteSpace knowledge graph visualization and analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Review
- Low-level laser therapy in osteoarthritic pain: A narrative review with an approach to integrated clinical use.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Review
- Auricular neuromodulation by low level laser therapy versus placebo laser therapy in prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: a randomized controlled study protocol.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Predictors for Poor Outcomes at Six Months on Pain, Disability, Psychological and Health Status in Greek Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain After Receiving Physiotherapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of 650 nm invasive laser acupuncture on non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- High- and Low-Level Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Orthopedic Pain: A Systematic Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe efficacy of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) for chronic back pain remains controversial due to insufficient trial data. We aimed to conduct an updated review to determine if LLLT (including laser acupuncture) has specific benefits in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).
methodsElectronic databases were searched for randomised trials using sham controls and blinded assessment examining the intervention of LLLT in adults with CNLBP. Primary outcomes were pain and global assessment of improvement with up to short-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes were disability, range of back movement, and adverse effects. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted. Subgroup analyses were based on laser dose, duration of baseline pain, and whether or not laser therapy used an acupuncture approach.
results15 studies were selected involving 1039 participants. At immediate and short-term follow-up there was significant pain reduction of up to WMD (weighted mean difference) -1.40 cm (95% CI -1.91 to -0.88 cm) in favour of laser treatment, occurring in trials using at least 3 Joules (J) per point, with baseline pain <30 months and in non-acupuncture LLLT trials. Global assessment showed a risk ratio of 2.16 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.90) in favour of laser treatment in the same groups only at immediate follow-up.
conclusionsWe demonstrated moderate quality of evidence (GRADE) to support a clinically important benefit in LLLT for CNLBP in the short term, which was only seen following higher laser dose interventions and in participants with a shorter duration of back pain. Rigorously blinded trials using appropriate laser dosage would provide greater certainty around this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.