Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27207664›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2016

Sulfotransferase-1A1-dependent bioactivation of aristolochic acid I and N-hydroxyaristolactam I in human cells.

Keiji Hashimoto, Irina N Zaitseva, Radha Bonala, Sivaprasad Attaluri, Katherine Ozga, Charles R Iden, Francis Johnson, Masaaki Moriya, Arthur P Grollman, Viktoriya S Sidorenko

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Additive Effects of Arsenic and Aristolochic Acid in Chemical Carcinogenesis of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelium.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keiji HashimotoDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Irina N ZaitsevaDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Radha BonalaDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Sivaprasad AttaluriDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Katherine OzgaDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Charles R IdenDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Francis JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Masaaki MoriyaDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Arthur P GrollmanDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Viktoriya S SidorenkoDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences.
Pharmac · NZStony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aristolochic acids (AA) are implicated in the development of chronic renal disease and upper urinary tract carcinoma in humans. Using in vitro approaches, we demonstrated that N-hydroxyaristolactams, metabolites derived from partial nitroreduction of AA, require sulfotransferase (SULT)-catalyzed conjugation with a sulfonyl group to form aristolactam-DNA adducts. Following up on this observation, bioactivation of AA-I and N-hydroxyaristolactam I (AL-I-NOH) was studied in human kidney (HK-2) and skin fibroblast (GM00637) cell lines. Pentachlorophenol, a known SULT inhibitor, significantly reduced cell death and aristolactam-DNA adduct levels in HK-2 cells following exposure to AA-I and AL-I-NOH, suggesting a role for Phase II metabolism in AA activation. A gene knockdown, siRNA approach was employed to establish the involvement of selected SULTs and nitroreductases in AA-I bioactivation. Silencing of SULT1A1 and PAPSS2 led to a significant decrease in aristolactam-DNA levels in both cell lines following exposure to AA-I, indicating the critical role for sulfonation in the activation of AA-I in vivo Since HK-2 cells proved relatively resistant to knockdown with siRNAs, gene silencing of xanthine oxidoreductase, cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase and NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase was conducted in GM00637 cells, showing a significant increase, decrease and no effect on aristolactam-DNA levels, respectively. In GM00637 cells exposed to AL-I-NOH, suppressing the SULT pathway led to a significant decrease in aristolactam-DNA formation, mirroring data obtained for AA-I. We conclude from these studies that SULT1A1 is involved in the bioactivation of AA-I through the sulfonation of AL-I-NOH, contributing significantly to the toxicities of AA observed in vivo.

Indexed as

Aristolochic AcidsArylsulfotransferaseCarcinogensDNAFibroblastsGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansKidneyMultienzyme ComplexesNADPH-Ferrihemoprotein ReductasePentachlorophenolRNA, Small InterferingSulfate AdenylyltransferaseXanthine Dehydrogenasearistolactam Iaristolochic acid IAristolochic AcidsArylsulfotransferaseCarcinogensDNAMultienzyme ComplexesNADPH-Ferrihemoprotein ReductasePAPS synthetasePentachlorophenolRNA, Small InterferingSulfate AdenylyltransferaseSULT1A1 protein, humanXanthine Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID27207664
PMCPMC4936383
OpenAlexW2336284576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.