Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27207659›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2016

Carcinogen-specific mutations in preferred Ras-Raf pathway oncogenes directed by strand bias.

Ross R Keller, Shelley A Gestl, Amy Q Lu, Alicia Hoke, David J Feith, Edward J Gunther

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ross R KellerJake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research and.
Shelley A GestlJake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research and.
Amy Q LuJake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research and.
Alicia HokeJake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research and.
David J FeithDivision of Hematology and the Cancer Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA and.
Edward J GuntherJake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research and.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

MAMMALIAN POLYAMINE METABOLISMR01CA018138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI FEITH, DAVID J. · 1985 to 2015
$2.8M
Modeling breast cancer relapse prevention in miceR01CA152222 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GUNTHER, EDWARD J · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA018138NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carcinogen exposures inscribe mutation patterns on cancer genomes and sometimes bias the acquisition of driver mutations toward preferred oncogenes, potentially dictating sensitivity to targeted agents. Whether and how carcinogen-specific mutation patterns direct activation of preferred oncogenes remains poorly understood. Here, mouse models of breast cancer were exploited to uncover a mechanistic link between strand-biased mutagenesis and oncogene preference. When chemical carcinogens were employed during Wnt1-initiated mammary tumorigenesis, exposure to either 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) dramatically accelerated tumor onset. Mammary tumors that followed DMBA exposure nearly always activated the Ras pathway via somatic Hras(CAA61CTA) mutations. Surprisingly, mammary tumors that followed ENU exposure typically lacked Hras mutations, and instead activated the Ras pathway downstream via Braf(GTG636GAG) mutations. Hras(CAA61CTA) mutations involve an A-to-T change on the sense strand, whereas Braf(GTG636GAG) mutations involve an inverse T-to-A change, suggesting that strand-biased mutagenesis may determine oncogene preference. To examine this possibility further, we turned to an alternative Wnt-driven tumor model in which carcinogen exposures augment a latent mammary tumor predisposition in Apc(min) mice. DMBA and ENU each accelerated mammary tumor onset in Apc(min) mice by introducing somatic, "second-hit" Apc mutations. Consistent with our strand bias model, DMBA and ENU generated strikingly distinct Apc mutation patterns, including stringently strand-inverse mutation signatures at A:T sites. Crucially, these contrasting signatures precisely match those proposed to confer bias toward Hras(CAA61CTA) versus Braf(GTG636GAG) mutations in the original tumor sets. Our findings highlight a novel mechanism whereby exposure history acts through strand-biased mutagenesis to specify activation of preferred oncogenes.

Indexed as

9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthraceneAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisCarcinogensEthylnitrosoureaFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenotypeHumansMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Wnt1 Protein9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthraceneBiomarkers, TumorBraf protein, mouseCarcinogensEthylnitrosoureaHras protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Wnt1 ProteinWnt1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID27207659
PMCPMC4967214
OpenAlexW2406268687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.