Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27207260›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Transcriptome analysis revealed the drought-responsive genes in Tibetan hulless barley.

Xingquan Zeng, Lijun Bai, Zexiu Wei, Hongjun Yuan, Yulin Wang, Qijun Xu, Yawei Tang, Tashi Nyima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptome Profiling ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xingquan ZengTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China.
Lijun BaiChengdu Life Baseline Technology Co., LTD, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zexiu WeiTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China.
Hongjun YuanTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China.
Yulin WangTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China.
Qijun XuTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China.
Yawei TangTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China.
Tashi NyimaTibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850002, China. nima_zhaxi@sina.com.
Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences · CNTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHulless barley, also called naked barley, is an important cereal crop worldwide, serving as a healthy food both for human consumption and animal feed. Nevertheless, it often suffered from drought stress during its growth and development, resulting in a drastic reduction in barley yields. Therefore, study on molecular mechanism of hulless barley drought-tolerance is very important for increasing barley production. To investigate molecular mechanism of barley drought-resistance, this study examined co-regulated mRNAs that show a change in expression pattern under early well water, later water deficit and finally water recovery treatments, and to identify mRNAs specific to water limiting conditions.

resultsTotal of 853 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected and categorized into nine clusters, in which VI and VIII were apparently up-regulated under low relative soil moisture content (RSMC) level. The majority of genes in these two clusters was relevant to abiotic stress responses in abscisic acid (ABA) dependent and independent signaling pathway, including NCED, PYR/PYL/RCAR, SnRK2, ABF, MYB/MYC, AP2/ERF family, LEA and DHN. In contrast, genes within clusters II and IV were generally down-regulated under water stress; cluster IX genes were up-regulated during water recovery response to both low and high RSMC levels. Genes in implicated in tetrapyrrole binding, photosystem and photosynthetic membrane were the most affected in cluster IX.

conclusionTaken together, our findings indicate that the responses of hulless barley to drought stress shows differences in the pathways and genes activated. Furthermore, all these genes displayed different sensitivities to soil water deficit and might be profitable for future drought tolerance improvement in barley and other crops.

Indexed as

DroughtsGene Expression ProfilingStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeAdaptation, BiologicalCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene OntologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHordeumModels, BiologicalReproducibility of ResultsSignal TransductionTibetABADGEDrought-responsive genesHordeum vuglareTetrapyrroleTranscriptome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27207260
PMCPMC4875595
OpenAlexW2400240433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.