Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27207233›Full record

ReviewIntegrative cancer therapies2016

Coley's Lessons Remembered: Augmenting Mistletoe Therapy.

Maurice Orange, Uwe Reuter, Uwe Hobohm

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative cancer therapies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The authors respond to feedback onFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Role of Innate Immunity in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Revisiting Coley's Toxins: Immunogenic Cardiolipins fromJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maurice OrangeKlinik Arlesheim, Switzerland.
Uwe ReuterKlinik-im-LEBEN, Greiz, Germany.
Uwe HobohmTHM University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany uwe.hobohm@mni.thm.de.
Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The following four observations point in the same direction, namely that there is an unleveraged potential for stimulating the innate immune system against cancer: (1) experimental treatments with bacterial extracts more than 100 years ago by Coley and contemporaries, (2) a positive correlation between spontaneous regressions and febrile infection, (3) epidemiological data suggesting an inverse correlation between a history of infection and the likelihood of developing cancer, and (4) our recent finding that a cocktail of pattern recognition receptor ligands (PRRLs) can eradicate solid tumors in cancer mice if applied metronomically. Because the main immunostimulating component of mistletoe extract (ME), mistletoe lectin, has been shown to be a PRRL as well, we suggest to apply ME in combination with additional PRRLs. Additional PRRLs can be found in approved drugs already on the market. Therefore, augmentation of ME might be feasible, with the aim of reattaining the old successes using approved drugs rather than bacterial extracts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBiological ProductsHumansImmunity, InnateNeoplasmsReceptors, Pattern RecognitionBiological ProductsReceptors, Pattern Recognitioncancer immunotherapyColey’s toxinmistletoe lectinmistletoe therapypattern recognition receptor ligandspontaneous regression

Identifiers

PMID27207233
PMCPMC5739169
OpenAlexW2404750092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.