Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016
Correlation of EGFR-expression with safety and efficacy outcomes in SQUIRE: a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin plus necitumumab versus gemcitabine-cisplatin alone in the first-line treatment of patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00981058 (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Study of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Chemotherapy Plus Necitumumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Study of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Chemotherapy Plus Necitumumab (IMC-11F8) Versus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Chemotherapy Alone in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Stage IV Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paclitaxel liposome for injection (Lipusu) plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel controlled clinical study.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Isolation and molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients using a microfluidic chip type cell sorter.Cancer science · 2018Trial
- Cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab versus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in advanced NSCLC (SWOG S0819): a randomised, phase 3 study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2018Trial
- RAS signaling in carcinogenesis, cancer therapy and resistance mechanisms.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Amivantamab in Advanced or Metastatic EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Improved Production of Anti-FGF-2 Nanobody Using Pichia pastoris and Its Effect on Antiproliferation of Keratinocytes and Alleviation of Psoriasis.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2023Article
- lncRNA ASBEL and lncRNA Erbb4-IR reduce chemoresistance against gemcitabine and cisplatin in stage IV lung squamous cell carcinoma via the microRNA-21/LZTFL1 axis.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Heterogeneity of resistant mechanisms in anFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A Hypoxia-Related Signature for Predicting Prognosis, Cellular Processes, Immune Microenvironment and Targeted Compounds in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Therapeutic advances in non-small cell lung cancer: Focus on clinical development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy.MedComm · 2021Review
- Gefitinib Combined with Cetuximab for the Treatment of Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring the EGFR-Intergenic Region (SEC61G) Fusion and EGFR Amplification.The oncologist · 2021Article
- 2020 Innovation-Based Optimism for Lung Cancer Outcomes.The oncologist · 2021Review
- A Review of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Impact of EGFR amplification on survival of patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Value of circular RNA 0007385 in disease monitoring and prognosis estimation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Spectrum of EGFR aberrations and potential clinical implications: insights from integrative pan-cancer analysis.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2020Article
- Chemovirotherapy of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Combining Oncolytic Adenovirus With Gemcitabine.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Current Treatment Approaches and the Role of Afatinib.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Review
- Transcriptional profiling of long-intergenic noncoding RNAs in lung squamous cell carcinoma and its value in diagnosis and prognosis.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSQUIRE demonstrated addition of necitumumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin significantly improved survival in patients with stage IV sq-NSCLC. Here, we report additional outcomes for the subpopulation of patients with tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with pathologically confirmed stage IV sq-NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive a maximum of six 3-week cycles of gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2) i.v., days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1) chemotherapy with or without necitumumab (800 mg i.v., days 1 and 8). Patients in the chemotherapy plus necitumumab group with no progression continued on necitumumab alone until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. SQUIRE included mandatory tissue collection. EGFR protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a central laboratory. Exploratory analyses were pre-specified for patients with EGFR protein expressing (EGFR > 0) and non-expressing (EGFR = 0) tumors.
resultsA total of 982 patients [90% of intention-to-treat (ITT)] had evaluable IHC results. The large majority of these patients (95%) had tumor samples expressing EGFR protein; only 5% had tumors without detectable EGFR protein. Overall survival (OS) for EGFR > 0 patients was significantly longer in the necitumumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group than in the gemcitabine-cisplatin group {stratified hazard ratio (HR) 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.92; P = 0.002]; median 11.7 months (95% CI 10.7, 12.9) versus 10.0 months (8.9, 11.4)}. Additionally, an OS benefit was seen in all pre-specified subgroups in EGFR > 0 patients. However, OS HR for EGFR = 0 was 1.52. Adverse events of interest with the largest difference between treatment groups in EGFR > 0 patients (Grade ≥3) were hypomagnesemia (10% versus <1%) and skin rash (6% versus <1%).
conclusionsIn line with SQUIRE ITT, addition of necitumumab to gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly prolonged OS and was generally well tolerated in the subpopulation of patients with EGFR-expressing advanced sq-NSCLC. The benefit from addition of necitumumab to chemotherapy was not apparent in this analysis for the small subgroup of patients with non-EGFR-expressing tumors. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT00981058.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.