Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27206734›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Persistence of bacterial indicators and zoonotic pathogens in contaminated cattle wastes.

Giuseppe Blaiotta, Alessandro Di Cerbo, Nicoletta Murru, Raffaele Coppola, Maria Aponte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe BlaiottaDipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici (NA), Italy.
Alessandro Di CerboDipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via del pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Nicoletta MurruDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzione Animali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Foria 223, 80139, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele CoppolaDAAA, Università degli Studi del Molise, Via de Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Maria AponteDipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici (NA), Italy. aponte@unina.it.
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManure can provide a favourable environment for pathogens' survival. De-contamination may be conducted by extended storage, until field conditions are suitable for application to land as source of agricultural nutrients.

resultsThe hygienic evaluation of manure and slurry coming from a plant that collects cattle livestock wastes from a big slaughterhouse was carried out. Samples were even collected from spillages in the area around the plant. Microbial analyses highlighted the massive presence of faecal indicators in all samples: mean counts of Escherichia coli and enterococci were always above EU limits for marketable processed manure products. Cultures referable to the genus Brucella spp. were recorded in two samples of fresh manure but not in the aged ones. Conventional isolation techniques failed to detect members of the Mycobacterium genus, while by means of IS900 and F57 PCR real-time system on DNA directly extracted from environmental samples, the pathogen was detected in all cases.

conclusionsThoughtful design of manure storage infrastructure is critical to prevent spills and over-topping of an open structure. The documented overload situation seems to lay the basis for an ongoing environmental contamination by enteric organisms and opportunistic pathogens circuit faecal-oral route. Moreover, the type of wastes analysed during this study, namely a mixture of fresh cattle manure, bedding and rumen content, needs a longer storage period or, alternatively, of specific chemical, biological or thermal treatments for stabilization.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsBacteriaCattleHumansManureRefuse DisposalSoil MicrobiologyZoonosesManureEnvironmental risksFaecal indicatorsLivestock wastesMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisPathogensStorage

Identifiers

PMID27206734
PMCPMC4875618
OpenAlexW2398092327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.