Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27206656›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Evaluation of Immunoflourescence antibody assay for the detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis.

Ujjala Ghoshal, Sonali Khanduja, Priyannk Pant, Uday C Ghoshal

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Identification and Characterization of Three Spore Wall Proteins ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. An optimized assay for detectingJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ujjala GhoshalDepartment of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India. ujjalaghoshal@yahoo.co.in.
Sonali KhandujaDepartment of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.
Priyannk PantDepartment of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.
Uday C GhoshalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of microsporidia at the species level is important for therapeutic purpose. The available techniques, modified trichrome (MT) staining cannot differentiate between species, while polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires a reference laboratory and skilled technical staff. Immunoflourescence antibody (IFA) assay is another technique, which can differentiate among commonest species of microsporidia. However, there are very limited studies on its efficacy worldwide. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate IFA assay for the detection of microsporidia and differentiation among commonest species, Enterocytozoon bieneusi (E. bieneusi) and Encephalitozoon intestinalis infecting immunocompromised patients. Stool samples from 200 immunocompromised patients (19 with microsporidia and 181 without microsporidia using MT staining) were tested for species identification by PCR-RFLP and IFA assay. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated as per standard formulae. Kappa statistics was used to assess the agreement between three tests. Of 200 immunocompromised patients, 21 and 20 patients had microsporidia using PCR and IFA assay, respectively. IFA assay and PCR identified E. bieneusi in all patients infected with microsporidia. Considering MT stain as gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of IFA assay was 100 and 99.4 %, respectively. Upon considering PCR as gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of IFA assay was 95.2 and 100 %, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of IFA assay was 99.5 % along with its high test agreement with MT staining and PCR (K = 0.915, p = 0.049; K = 0.973, p = 0.027). IFA assay is highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting and identifying species of microsporidia among immunocompromised patients. E. bieneusi was the commonest species identified.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalEncephalitozoonEncephalitozoonosisEnterocytozoonFecesFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunocompromised HostIntestinal DiseasesMicrosporidiosisPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingAntibodies, MonoclonalIntestinal microsporidiosisMicrosporidiaMonoclonal antibody assay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.