Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27206539›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2016

A Randomized Controlled Trial of IVR-Based Alcohol Brief Intervention to Promote Patient-Provider Communication in Primary Care.

Gail L Rose, Gary J Badger, Joan M Skelly, Tonya A Ferraro, Charles D MacLean, John E Helzer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seismic Change and Micro-Innovation.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gail L RoseDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Vermont , Mail Stop #457 OH3, 1 So. Prospect St., Burlington, VT, 05401, USA. gail.rose@uvm.edu.
Gary J BadgerDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Joan M SkellyDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Tonya A FerraroDepartment of Research Administrative Services, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Charles D MacLeanDepartment of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
John E HelzerDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Vermont , Mail Stop #457 OH3, 1 So. Prospect St., Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.

Funding

Automated Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Primary Care Using IVRR01AA018658 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI ROSE, GAIL LYNNE · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrief interventions for unhealthy drinking in primary care settings are efficacious, but underutilized. Efforts to improve rates of brief intervention though provider education and office systems redesign have had limited impact. Our novel brief intervention uses interactive voice response (IVR) to provide information and advice directly to unhealthy drinkers before a physician office visit, with the goals of stimulating in-office dialogue about drinking and decreasing unhealthy drinking. This automated approach is potentially scalable for wide application.

objectiveWe aimed to examine the effect of a pre-visit IVR-delivered brief alcohol intervention (IVR-BI) on patient-provider discussions of alcohol during the visit.

designThis was a parallel group randomized controlled trial with two treatment arms: 1) IVR-BI or 2) usual care (no IVR-BI).

participantsIn all, 1,567 patients were recruited from eight university medical center-affiliated internal medicine and family medicine clinics.

interventionsIVR-BI is a brief alcohol intervention delivered by automated telephone. It has four components, based on the intervention steps outlined in the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism guidelines for clinicians: 1) ask about alcohol use, 2) assess for alcohol use disorders, 3) advise patient to cut down or quit drinking, and 4) follow up at subsequent visits. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes were patient reported: patient-provider discussion of alcohol during the visit; patient initiation of the discussion; and provider's recommendation about the patient's alcohol use. KEY

resultsPatients randomized to IVR-BI were more likely to have reported discussing alcohol with their provider (52 % vs. 44 %, p = 0.003), bringing up the topic themselves (20 % vs. 12 %, p < 0.001), and receiving a recommendation (20 % vs. 14 %, p < 0.001). Other predictors of outcome included baseline consumption, education, age, and alcohol use disorder diagnosis.

conclusionsProviding automated brief interventions to patients prior to a primary care visit promotes discussion about unhealthy drinking and increases specific professional advice regarding changing drinking behavior.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismEarly Medical InterventionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSimulation TrainingSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and Questionnairesalcohol consumptionautomated interventionautomated telephonebrief interventioninteractive voice responsepatient engagementphysician–patient relationsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID27206539
PMCPMC4978673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.