Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27206485›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Characterization of the watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.; Brassicaceae) transcriptome using RNASeq and identification of candidate genes for important phytonutrient traits linked to human health.

Nikol Voutsina, Adrienne C Payne, Robert D Hancock, Graham J J Clarkson, Steve D Rothwell, Mark A Chapman, Gail Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Making watercress (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikol VoutsinaCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Adrienne C PayneCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Robert D HancockCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
Graham J J ClarksonVitacress Salads Ltd, Lower Link Farm, St Mary Bourne, Andover, SP11 6DB, UK.
Steve D RothwellVitacress Salads Ltd, Lower Link Farm, St Mary Bourne, Andover, SP11 6DB, UK.
Mark A ChapmanCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Gail TaylorCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. G.Taylor@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBVitacress (United Kingdom) · GBJames Hutton Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0900747Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsuming watercress is thought to provide health benefits as a consequence of its phytonutrient composition. However, for watercress there are currently limited genetic resources underpinning breeding efforts for either yield or phytonutritional traits. In this paper, we use RNASeq data from twelve watercress accessions to characterize the transcriptome, perform candidate gene mining and conduct differential expression analysis for two key phytonutritional traits: antioxidant (AO) capacity and glucosinolate (GLS) content.

resultsThe watercress transcriptome was assembled to 80,800 transcripts (48,732 unigenes); 71 % of which were annotated based on orthology to Arabidopsis. Differential expression analysis comparing watercress accessions with 'high' and 'low' AO and GLS resulted in 145 and 94 differentially expressed loci for AO capacity and GLS respectively. Differentially expressed loci between high and low AO watercress were significantly enriched for genes involved in plant defence and response to stimuli, in line with the observation that AO are involved in plant stress-response. Differential expression between the high and low GLS watercress identified links to GLS regulation and also novel transcripts warranting further investigation. Additionally, we successfully identified watercress orthologs for Arabidopsis phenylpropanoid, GLS and shikimate biosynthesis pathway genes, and compiled a catalogue of polymorphic markers for future applications.

conclusionsOur work describes the first transcriptome of watercress and establishes the foundation for further molecular study by providing valuable resources, including sequence data, annotated transcripts, candidate genes and markers.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingQuantitative Trait, HeritableTranscriptomeAntioxidantsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGlucosinolatesHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationNasturtiumPhenotypePhylogenyPhytochemicalsPlants, EdiblePolymorphism, GeneticAntioxidantsGlucosinolatesPhytochemicalsAntioxidant capacityBrassicaceaede novo assemblyDifferential expressionGluconasturtiinGlucosinolatesNasturtium officinalePhenylpropanoid pathwayRNASeqWatercress

Identifiers

PMID27206485
PMCPMC4875719
OpenAlexW2400074828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.