Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27203741›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Metastatic site-specific polarization of macrophages in intracranial breast cancer metastases.

Nora Rippaus, David Taggart, Jennifer Williams, Tereza Andreou, Heiko Wurdak, Krzysztof Wronski, Mihaela Lorger

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Between Prometheus and Thanatos: Reflections on Intracardiac Injection Models for Metastasis in Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Biological profile of breast cancer brain metastasis.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Immune related biomarkers for cancer metastasis to the brain.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Aging and CNS Myeloid Cell Depletion Attenuate Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nora RippausInstitute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK.
David TaggartInstitute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK.
Jennifer WilliamsInstitute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK.
Tereza AndreouInstitute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK.
Heiko WurdakInstitute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK.
Krzysztof WronskiGeneflow Ltd, Elmhurst, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 8EX, UK.
Mihaela LorgerInstitute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J001171/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to primary tumors, the understanding of macrophages within metastases is very limited. In order to compare macrophage phenotypes between different metastatic sites, we established a pre-clinical mouse model of intracranial breast cancer metastasis in which cancer lesions develop simultaneously within the brain parenchyma and the dura. This mimics a situation that is commonly occurring in the clinic. Flow cytometry analysis revealed significant differences in the activation state of metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs) at the two locations. Concurrently, gene expression analysis identified significant differences in molecular profiles of cancer cells that have metastasized to the brain parenchyma as compared to the dura. This included differences in inflammation-related pathways, NF-kB1 activity and cytokine profiles. The most significantly upregulated cytokine in brain parenchyma- versus dura-derived cancer cells was Lymphotoxin β and a gain-of-function approach demonstrated a direct involvement of this factor in the M2 polarization of parenchymal MAMs. This established a link between metastatic site-specific properties of cancer cells and the MAM activation state.

Indexed as

Cell MovementCell PolarityAnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEncephalitisFemaleHumansMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicOrgan Specificitybreast cancer brain metastasesdural metastaseslymphotoxin βmetastasis-associated macrophagestumor-associated macrophages

Identifiers

PMID27203741
PMCPMC5173073
OpenAlexW2343123390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.