Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27203622›Full record

SynthesisBehaviour research and therapy2016

Rumination and postnatal depression: A systematic review and a cognitive model.

Hannah DeJong, Elaine Fox, Alan Stein

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Behaviour research and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Individual differences in symptoms of maternal depression and associations with parenting behavior.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah DeJongDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. Electronic address: hannah.dejong@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Elaine FoxDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, 9 South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
Alan SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Warneford Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14096Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090139Wellcome Trust 106284/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postnatal depression (PND) confers risk for a range of negative child developmental outcomes, at least in part through its impact on parenting behaviour. Whilst the behavioural effects of depression on parenting are well established, the cognitive mechanisms that may mediate this effect are less well understood. The current paper proposes that rumination may be a key cognitive mechanism through which parenting is affected in PND, and provides a systematic review of the existing literature on rumination in the context of perinatal depression. The review identifies ten relevant papers. Eight are questionnaire-based studies examining the role of rumination in predicting future depression and/or mother-infant relationship outcomes, such as bonding. Two are experimental studies examining the effects of induced rumination on parenting behaviours. The results of the review are discussed, and remaining questions highlighted. We then present a new theoretical model, developed specifically for the perinatal context, and informed by existing models of rumination and worry. Our cognitive model emphasises the relationship between rumination, cognitive biases and cognitive control, and the impact of these variables on infant cue processing and subsequent parenting responses. The model provides a potential framework for future work in this area, and to guide the development of treatment interventions.

Indexed as

ThinkingDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansModels, PsychologicalMother-Child RelationsParentingCognitive biasesCognitive controlContingent responsivenessParentingPostnatal depressionRumination

Identifiers

PMID27203622
PMCPMC4898208
OpenAlexW2346681722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.