ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
A Detailed Data-Driven Network Model of Prefrontal Cortex Reproduces Key Features of In Vivo Activity.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synapses mediate the effects of different types of stress on working memory: a brain-inspired spiking neural network study.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
- A study on appetite of overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Multi-scale spiking network model of human cerebral cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- BrainCog: A spiking neural network based, brain-inspired cognitive intelligence engine for brain-inspired AI and brain simulation.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Effective connectivity of the human mirror neuron system during social cognition.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022Article
- From descriptive connectome to mechanistic connectome: Generative modeling in functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- Comparison Between Human and Rodent Neurons for Persistent Activity Performance: A Biologically Plausible Computational Investigation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Computational Investigation of Contributions from Different Subtypes of Interneurons in Prefrontal Cortex for Information Maintenance.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Dynamic Causal Modeling for fMRI With Wilson-Cowan-Based Neuronal Equations.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Deep neural networks in psychiatry.Molecular psychiatry · 2019Review
- Hippocampal-Cortical Memory Trace Transfer and Reactivation Through Cell-Specific Stimulus and Spontaneous Background Noise.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Synaptic Impairment and Robustness of Excitatory Neuronal Networks with Different Topologies.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prefrontal cortex is centrally involved in a wide range of cognitive functions and their impairment in psychiatric disorders. Yet, the computational principles that govern the dynamics of prefrontal neural networks, and link their physiological, biochemical and anatomical properties to cognitive functions, are not well understood. Computational models can help to bridge the gap between these different levels of description, provided they are sufficiently constrained by experimental data and capable of predicting key properties of the intact cortex. Here, we present a detailed network model of the prefrontal cortex, based on a simple computationally efficient single neuron model (simpAdEx), with all parameters derived from in vitro electrophysiological and anatomical data. Without additional tuning, this model could be shown to quantitatively reproduce a wide range of measures from in vivo electrophysiological recordings, to a degree where simulated and experimentally observed activities were statistically indistinguishable. These measures include spike train statistics, membrane potential fluctuations, local field potentials, and the transmission of transient stimulus information across layers. We further demonstrate that model predictions are robust against moderate changes in key parameters, and that synaptic heterogeneity is a crucial ingredient to the quantitative reproduction of in vivo-like electrophysiological behavior. Thus, we have produced a physiologically highly valid, in a quantitative sense, yet computationally efficient PFC network model, which helped to identify key properties underlying spike time dynamics as observed in vivo, and can be harvested for in-depth investigation of the links between physiology and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.