Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27203446›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2016

Boosting Central Nervous System Axon Regeneration by Circumventing Limitations of Natural Cytokine Signaling.

Marco Leibinger, Anastasia Andreadaki, Philipp Gobrecht, Evgeny Levin, Heike Diekmann, Dietmar Fischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. CXCR4/CXCL12-mediated entrapment of axons at the injury site compromises optic nerve regeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco LeibingerDivision of Experimental Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anastasia AndreadakiDivision of Experimental Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipp GobrechtDivision of Experimental Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Evgeny LevinDivision of Experimental Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heike DiekmannDivision of Experimental Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dietmar FischerDivision of Experimental Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) do not normally regenerate injured axons, but die upon axotomy. Although IL-6-like cytokines are reportedly neuroprotective and promote optic nerve regeneration, their overall regenerative effects remain rather moderate. Here, we hypothesized that direct activation of the gp130 receptor by the designer cytokine hyper-IL-6 (hIL-6) might induce stronger RGC regeneration than natural cytokines. Indeed, hIL-6 stimulated neurite growth of adult cultured RGCs with significantly higher efficacy than CNTF or IL-6. This neurite growth promoting effect could be attributed to stronger activation of the JAK/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways and was also observed in peripheral dorsal root ganglion neurons. Moreover, hIL-6 abrogated axon growth inhibition by central nervous system (CNS) myelin. Remarkably, continuous hIL-6 expression upon RGC-specific AAV transduction after optic nerve crush exerted stronger axon regeneration than other known regeneration promoting treatments such as lens injury and PTEN knockout, with some axons growing through the optic chiasm 6 weeks after optic nerve injury. Combination of hIL-6 with RGC-specific PTEN knockout further enhanced optic nerve regeneration. Therefore, direct activation of gp130 signaling might be a novel, clinically applicable approach for robust CNS repair.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCells, CulturedCentral Nervous SystemCytokine Receptor gp130HumansInterleukin-6MiceMyelin SheathNerve RegenerationPTEN PhosphohydrolaseRetinal Ganglion CellsSignal TransductionCytokine Receptor gp130IL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6PTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27203446
PMCPMC5112033
OpenAlexW2461272607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.