Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27203441›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2016

CRISPR Repair Reveals Causative Mutation in a Preclinical Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Wen-Hsuan Wu, Yi-Ting Tsai, Sally Justus, Ting-Ting Lee, Lijuan Zhang, Chyuan-Sheng Lin, Alexander G Bassuk, Vinit B Mahajan, Stephen H Tsang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. KIF11 UFMylation Maintains Photoreceptor Cilium Integrity and Retinal Homeostasis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen-Hsuan WuBarbara and Donald Jonas Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Human Nutrition, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Yi-Ting TsaiBarbara and Donald Jonas Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Human Nutrition, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Sally JustusBarbara and Donald Jonas Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Human Nutrition, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Ting-Ting LeeBarbara and Donald Jonas Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Human Nutrition, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Lijuan ZhangBarbara and Donald Jonas Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Human Nutrition, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Chyuan-Sheng LinDepartment of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Alexander G BassukDepartment of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Vinit B MahajanOmics Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Stephen H TsangBarbara and Donald Jonas Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Human Nutrition, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Iowa · USColumbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Toward mechanism- and gene-based therapies for retinal degenerationR01EY018213 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Stephen H Tsang · 2008 to 2026
$6.6M
Gene Silencing and Gene Editing in PhototransductionR01EY024698 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Stephen H Tsang · 2015 to 2026
$4.7M
Mechanistic Studies on Regenerative Medicine Approaches to Childhood BlindnessR01EY026682 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BASSUK, ALEXANDER G, MAHAJAN, VINIT B · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Mechanism-based therapies for photoreceptor degenerationR01EY025225 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAHAJAN, VINIT B · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018213NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024698NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025225NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massive parallel sequencing enables identification of numerous genetic variants in mutant organisms, but determining pathogenicity of any one mutation can be daunting. The most commonly studied preclinical model of retinitis pigmentosa called the "rodless" (rd1) mouse is homozygous for two mutations: a nonsense point mutation (Y347X) and an intronic insertion of a leukemia virus (Xmv-28). Distinguishing which mutation causes retinal degeneration is still under debate nearly a century after the discovery of this model organism. Here, we performed gene editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and demonstrated that the Y347X mutation is the causative variant of disease. Genome editing in the first generation produced animals that were mosaic for the corrected allele but still showed neurofunction preservation despite low repair frequencies. Furthermore, second-generation CRISPR-repaired mice showed an even more robust rescue and amelioration of the disease. This predicts excellent outcomes for gene editing in diseased human tissue, as Pde6b, the mutated gene in rd1 mice, has an orthologous intron-exon relationship comparable with the human PDE6B gene. Not only do these findings resolve the debate surrounding the source of neurodegeneration in the rd1 model, but they also provide the first example of homology-directed recombination-mediated gene correction in the visual system.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDNA RepairMutationAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 6Disease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyExonsGene EditingGenetic LociHomologous RecombinationMiceMice, TransgenicPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal DegenerationCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 6Pde6b protein, mouseRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID27203441
PMCPMC5023380
OpenAlexW2401478799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.