Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27203113›Full record

ArticleCell2016

Cistrome and Epicistrome Features Shape the Regulatory DNA Landscape.

Ronan C O'Malley, Shao-Shan Carol Huang, Liang Song, Mathew G Lewsey, Anna Bartlett, Joseph R Nery, Mary Galli, Andrea Gallavotti, Joseph R Ecker

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 754 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
754citing papers in PubMed
247.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

754 citing papers in PubMed, 1,658 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conserved and Promoter-SpecificInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence for Plant Gene Regulatory Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. A 32-bp deletion inHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

694 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronan C O'MalleyGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Plant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Shao-Shan Carol HuangGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Plant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Liang SongPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Mathew G LewseyPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Anna BartlettGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Joseph R NeryGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Mary GalliGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Andrea GallavottiWaksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Joseph R EckerGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Plant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: ecker@salk.edu.
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Ye Zheng · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cistrome is the complete set of transcription factor (TF) binding sites (cis-elements) in an organism, while an epicistrome incorporates tissue-specific DNA chemical modifications and TF-specific chemical sensitivities into these binding profiles. Robust methods to construct comprehensive cistrome and epicistrome maps are critical for elucidating complex transcriptional networks that underlie growth, behavior, and disease. Here, we describe DNA affinity purification sequencing (DAP-seq), a high-throughput TF binding site discovery method that interrogates genomic DNA with in-vitro-expressed TFs. Using DAP-seq, we defined the Arabidopsis cistrome by resolving motifs and peaks for 529 TFs. Because genomic DNA used in DAP-seq retains 5-methylcytosines, we determined that >75% (248/327) of Arabidopsis TFs surveyed were methylation sensitive, a property that strongly impacts the epicistrome landscape. DAP-seq datasets also yielded insight into the biology and binding site architecture of numerous TFs, demonstrating the value of DAP-seq for cost-effective cistromic and epicistromic annotation in any organism.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantResponse ElementsAmino Acid MotifsArabidopsisDNA, PlantEpigenesis, GeneticIndoleacetic AcidsPlant ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDNA, PlantIndoleacetic AcidsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27203113
PMCPMC4907330
OpenAlexW2401562190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.