Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200502›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2016

Changing national guidelines is not enough: the impact of 1990 IOM recommendations on gestational weight gain among US women.

R Hamad, A K Cohen, D H Rehkopf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Perspectives in obesity and pregnancy.Women's health (London, England) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R HamadDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-4077
A K CohenDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
D H RehkopfDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationKL2TR001083 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Intergenerational Obesity: Do Early Adversity and Pregnancy Explain Disparities?R01MD006104 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ABRAMS, BARBARA FAYE · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Life course contexts and work - quantifying impacts on aging and chronic diseaseK01AG047280 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REHKOPF, DAVID H · 2014 to 2018
$632k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001083NIA NIH HHS K01 AG047280NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD006104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with both long- and short-term maternal and child health outcomes, particularly obesity. Targeting maternal nutrition through policies is a potentially powerful pathway to influence these outcomes. Yet prior research has often failed to evaluate national policies and guidelines that address maternal and child health. In 1990, the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) released guidelines recommending different GWG thresholds based on women's pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), with the goal of improving infant birth weight. In this study, we employ quasi-experimental methods to examine whether the release of the IOM guidelines led to changes in GWG among a diverse and nationally representative sample of women.

methodsOur sample included female participants of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth who self-reported GWG for pregnancies during 1979-2000 (n=7442 pregnancies to 4173 women). We compared GWG before and after the guidelines were released using difference-in-differences (DID) and regression discontinuity (RD) analyses.

resultsIn DID analyses we found no reduction in GWG among overweight/obese women relative to normal/underweight women. Meanwhile, RD analyses demonstrated no changes in GWG by pre-pregnancy BMI for either overweight/obese or normal/underweight women. Results were similar for women regardless of educational attainment, race or parity.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that national guidelines had no effect on weight gain among pregnant women. These results have implications for the implementation of policies targeting maternal and child health via dietary behaviors.

Indexed as

National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionPregnant PeopleWeight GainAdultBirth WeightDirective CounselingFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLongitudinal StudiesObesityPolicy MakingPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID27200502
PMCPMC5050079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.