Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200414›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Quantifying Repetitive Transmission at Chemical Synapses: A Generative-Model Approach.

Alessandro Barri, Yun Wang, David Hansel, Gianluigi Mongillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Identifiability of a Binomial Synapse.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Model-Based Inference of Synaptic Transmission.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2017
    Review
  14. Functional consequences of pre- and postsynaptic expression of synaptic plasticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro BarriUnité d'Imagerie Dynamique du Neurone , Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Yun WangCaritas St. Elizabeth's Center, Tufts University , Boston, MA, USA.
David HanselCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 8119, Paris, France; Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Learning, Centre de Neurophysique, Physiologie et Pathologie, Université Descartes, Paris, France.
Gianluigi MongilloCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 8119, Paris, France; Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Learning, Centre de Neurophysique, Physiologie et Pathologie, Université Descartes, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dependence of the synaptic responses on the history of activation and their large variability are both distinctive features of repetitive transmission at chemical synapses. Quantitative investigations have mostly focused on trial-averaged responses to characterize dynamic aspects of the transmission--thus disregarding variability--or on the fluctuations of the responses in steady conditions to characterize variability--thus disregarding dynamics. We present a statistically principled framework to quantify the dynamics of the probability distribution of synaptic responses under arbitrary patterns of activation. This is achieved by constructing a generative model of repetitive transmission, which includes an explicit description of the sources of stochasticity present in the process. The underlying parameters are then selected via an expectation-maximization algorithm that is exact for a large class of models of synaptic transmission, so as to maximize the likelihood of the observed responses. The method exploits the information contained in the correlation between responses to produce highly accurate estimates of both quantal and dynamic parameters from the same recordings. The method also provides important conceptual and technical advances over existing state-of-the-art techniques. In particular, the repetition of the same stimulation in identical conditions becomes unnecessary. This paves the way to the design of optimal protocols to estimate synaptic parameters, to the quantitative comparison of synaptic models over benchmark datasets, and, most importantly, to the study of repetitive transmission under physiologically relevant patterns of synaptic activation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornFerretsIn Vitro TechniquesNeuronsNonlinear DynamicsPrefrontal CortexProbabilitySynapsesSynaptic TransmissionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationexpectation-maximizationgenerative modelingquantal analysisrepetitive transmissionshort-term plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27200414
PMCPMC4867027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.