Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200413›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Mapping Cortical Responses to Somatosensory Stimuli in Human Infants with Simultaneous Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Event-Related Potential Recording.

Madeleine Verriotis, Lorenzo Fabrizi, Amy Lee, Robert J Cooper, Maria Fitzgerald, Judith Meek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of breast milk on cortical pain response in newborns during the heel prick procedure: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A comparison of the effect of procedural pain on cerebral oxygen saturation between late preterm and term infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madeleine VerriotisDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-0370
Lorenzo FabriziDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Amy LeeDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Robert J CooperDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Maria FitzgeraldDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Judith MeekElizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals , London, WC1E 6DB, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M006468/1Wellcome Trust 090245/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and electroencephalography (EEG) have recently provided fundamental new information about how the newborn brain processes innocuous and noxious somatosensory information. However, results derived independently from these two techniques are not entirely consistent, raising questions about the relationship between hemodynamic and electrophysiological responses in the study of touch and pain processing in the newborn. To address this, we have recorded NIRS and EEG responses simultaneously for the first time in the human infant following noxious (time-locked clinically required heel lances) and innocuous tactile cutaneous stimulation in 30 newborn infants. The results show that both techniques can be used to record quantifiable and distinct innocuous and noxious evoked activity at a group level in the newborn cortex. Noxious stimulation elicits a peak hemodynamic response that is 10-fold larger than that elicited by an innocuous stimulus (HbO2: 2.0 vs 0.3 µM) and a distinct nociceptive-specific N3P3 waveform in electrophysiological recordings. However, a novel single-trial analysis revealed that hemodynamic and electrophysiological responses do not always co-occur at an individual level, although when they do (64% of noxious test occasions), they are significantly correlated in magnitude. These data show that, while hemodynamic and electrophysiological touch and pain brain activity in newborn infants are comparable in group analyses, important individual differences remain. These data indicate that integrated and multimodal brain monitoring is required to understand central touch and pain processing in the newborn.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHemoglobinsHumansInfantMaleNeurovascular CouplingOxyhemoglobinsPainPhysical StimulationPrincipal Component AnalysisSkinSomatosensory CortexdeoxyhemoglobinHemoglobinsOxyhemoglobinsEEGhemodynamicmultimodalneurovascular couplingnoxiouspain

Identifiers

PMID27200413
PMCPMC4867026
OpenAlexW2344712036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.