Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200385›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2016

Traumatic First Time Shoulder Dislocation: Surgery vs Non-Operative Treatment.

Ioannis Polyzois, Rupen Dattani, Rohit Gupta, Ofer Levy, A Ali Narvani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. First-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: Approach for the primary health care physician.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Patient-Preference Diagnostics: Adapting Stated-Preference Methods to Inform Effective Shared Decision Making.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ioannis PolyzoisRowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St Peters NHS FT Fortius Clinic, London, UK.
Rupen DattaniRowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St Peters NHS FT Fortius Clinic, London, UK.
Rohit GuptaRowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St Peters NHS FT Fortius Clinic, London, UK.
Ofer LevyRowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St Peters NHS FT Fortius Clinic, London, UK.
A Ali NarvaniRowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St Peters NHS FT Fortius Clinic, London, UK.
Fortius Clinic · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of first shoulder dislocation following reduction remains controversial. The two main options are immobilisation and arthroscopic stabilisation. The aim of this article is to highlight some of the issues that influence decision making when discussing management options with these patients, including natural history of the first time dislocation, outcomes of surgery and non-operative management particularly on the risk of future osteoarthritis (OA), the effects of delaying surgery and the optimal method of immobilisation. Extensive literature review was performed looking for previous publication addressing 4 points. i) Natural history of primary shoulder dislocation ii) Effect of surgical intervention on natural history iii) Risk of long term osteoarthritis with and without surgical intervention iv) Immobilisation techniques post reduction. Individuals younger than 25 years old are likely to re-dislocate with non-operative management. Surgery reduces risk of recurrent instability. Patients with recurrent instability appear to be at a higher risk of OA. Those who have surgical stabilisation do not appear to be at a higher risk than those who dislocate just once, but are less likely to develop OA than those with recurrent instability. Delaying surgery makes the stabilisation more demanding due to elongation of capsule, progressive labro-ligamentous injury, prevalence and severity of glenoid bone loss. Recent studies have failed to match the preliminary outcomes associated with external rotation braces. Defining the best timing and type of treatment remains a challenge and should be tailored to each individual's age, occupation and degree of physical activity.

Indexed as

DislocationFirst timeImmobilisationStabilisation

Identifiers

PMID27200385
PMCPMC4852033
OpenAlexW2325486257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.