Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200352›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2016

A Prospective Randomized Study on the Risk of Bacteremia in Banding versus Sclerotherapy of Esophageal Varices.

Marc J Zuckerman, Yi Jia, Jesus A Hernandez, Venkateswara R Kolli, Arturo Norte, Hemal Amin, Nancy A Casner, Alok Dwivedi, Hoi Ho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnosis and Management of Esophagogastric Varices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc J ZuckermanDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Yi JiaDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Jesus A HernandezDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Venkateswara R KolliDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Arturo NorteDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Hemal AminDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Nancy A CasnerDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Alok DwivediDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Hoi HoDivision of Infectious Disease, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , El Paso, Texas , USA.
Texas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal variceal banding may be less likely to cause bacteremia than sclerotherapy. The existing data about the frequency of bacteremia after esophageal variceal banding are conflicting, and few studies include both banding and sclerotherapy.

aimsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the frequency of bacteremia after esophageal variceal banding and sclerotherapy.

methodsOver a 2-year period, patients with liver disease admitted for upper gastrointestinal bleeding or for outpatient elective variceal therapy were enrolled. New patients were randomized preprocedure to either banding or sclerotherapy, and subsequent sessions utilized the initial procedure. The groups consisted of banding, sclerotherapy, and endoscopy without variceal therapy. Subjects underwent endoscopy by one out of three gastroenterologists. Blood cultures were obtained 5 min before and 30 min after endoscopy to check for bacteremia.

resultsPostendoscopic blood cultures were positive following 4 out of 139 (2.9%) sessions: 1 sclerotherapy and 3 control sessions. All postendoscopic positive blood cultures were found following emergency sessions (4/92, 4.3%). One pre-endoscopic blood culture was positive in a patient with emergency banding. The rates of positive postendoscopic blood cultures among groups with emergency banding (0/22, 0%), emergency sclerotherapy (1/41, 2.3%), and emergency control (3/29, 10.3%) were not significantly different. Postendoscopic positive blood cultures were not found after elective sessions with either banding or sclerotherapy.

conclusionsPostendoscopic bacteremia was infrequent following emergency endoscopy in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding. Bacteremia was not found after esophageal variceal banding, although this was not significantly less frequent than after sclerotherapy. Postendoscopic bacteremia was not associated with elective variceal therapy.

Indexed as

bacteremiabandingcirrhosisesophageal varicessclerotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27200352
PMCPMC4852182
OpenAlexW2343596640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.