Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200269›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2016

Comparison of rapid solvent extraction systems for the GC-MS/MS characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aged, contaminated soil.

Nagalakshmi Haleyur, Esmaeil Shahsavari, Abdulatif A Mansur, Eman Koshlaf, Paul D Morrison, A Mark Osborn, Andrew S Ball

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In silico machine learning-enabled detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Isolation of the Endophytic FungusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nagalakshmi HaleyurCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Esmaeil ShahsavariCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Abdulatif A MansurCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia; Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Azawia University, Libya.
Eman KoshlafCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Paul D MorrisonCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
A Mark OsbornCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Andrew S BallCentre for Environmental Sustainability and Remediation, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
RMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a major class of organic hydrocarbons with high molecular weight that originate from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Sixteen PAHs are included in the U.S Environmental Protection agency list of priority pollutants due to their mutagenic, carcinogenic, toxic and teratogenic properties. In this study, the development and optimization of a simplified and rapid solvent extraction for the characterisation of 16 USEPA priority poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in aged contaminated soils was established with subsequent analysis by GC-MS/MS. •Five different extraction solvent systems: dichloromethane: acetone, chloroform: methanol, dichloromethane, acetone: hexane and hexane were assessed in terms of their ability to extract PAHs from aged PAH-contaminated soils.•Highest PAH concentrations were extracted using acetone: hexane and chloroform: methanol. Given the greater toxicity associated with chloroform: methanol, acetone: hexane appears the best choice of solvent extraction system.•This protocol enables efficient extraction of PAHs from aged weathered soils.

Indexed as

BioremediationComparison of rapid solvent extraction systems for the GC–MS/MS characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aged, contaminated soilGC–MS/MSPAHsSoil contaminationSolvent extractionWeathered soils

Identifiers

PMID27200269
PMCPMC4864413
OpenAlexW2345165098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.