Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27200001›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Two Poplar-Associated Bacterial Isolates Induce Additive Favorable Responses in a Constructed Plant-Microbiome System.

Collin M Timm, Dale A Pelletier, Sara S Jawdy, Lee E Gunter, Jeremiah A Henning, Nancy Engle, Jayde Aufrecht, Emily Gee, Intawat Nookaew, Zamin Yang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic signatures inmSystems · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Major Biological Control Strategies for Plant Pathogens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assembly of themSphere · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Collin M TimmBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Dale A PelletierBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Sara S JawdyBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Lee E GunterBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Jeremiah A HenningDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, USA.
Nancy EngleBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Jayde AufrechtBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA; Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of TennesseeKnoxville, TN, USA.
Emily GeeBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Intawat NookaewBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Zamin YangBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Tse-Yuan LuBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Timothy J TschaplinskiBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Mitchel J DoktyczBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Gerald A TuskanBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
David J WestonBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological function of the plant-microbiome system is the result of contributions from the host plant and microbiome members. The Populus root microbiome is a diverse community that has high abundance of β- and γ-Proteobacteria, both classes which include multiple plant-growth promoting representatives. To understand the contribution of individual microbiome members in a community, we studied the function of a simplified community consisting of Pseudomonas and Burkholderia bacterial strains isolated from Populus hosts and inoculated on axenic Populus cutting in controlled laboratory conditions. Both strains increased lateral root formation and root hair production in Arabidopsis plate assays and are predicted to encode for different functions related to growth and plant growth promotion in Populus hosts. Inoculation individually, with either bacterial isolate, increased root growth relative to uninoculated controls, and while root area was increased in mixed inoculation, the interaction term was insignificant indicating additive effects of root phenotype. Complementary data including photosynthetic efficiency, whole-transcriptome gene expression and GC-MS metabolite expression data in individual and mixed inoculated treatments indicate that the effects of these bacterial strains are unique and additive. These results suggest that the function of a microbiome community may be predicted from the additive functions of the individual members.

Indexed as

Burkholderiamicrobiomeplant-microbe interactionsPopulus deltoidesPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID27200001
PMCPMC4845692
OpenAlexW2344565424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.