Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199981›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2016

Paradoxical Roles of the Neutrophil in Sepsis: Protective and Deleterious.

Fabiane Sônego, Fernanda Vargas E Silva Castanheira, Raphael Gomes Ferreira, Alexandre Kanashiro, Caio Abner Vitorino Gonçalves Leite, Daniele Carvalho Nascimento, David Fernando Colón, Vanessa de Fátima Borges, José Carlos Alves-Filho, Fernando Queiróz Cunha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Identification of Hub Neutrophil Coexpressed Genes in Acute PancreatitisEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NETosis and pyroptosis of immune cells in sepsis.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CXCR4iScience · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabiane SônegoDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Fernanda Vargas E Silva CastanheiraDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Raphael Gomes FerreiraDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Alexandre KanashiroDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Caio Abner Vitorino Gonçalves LeiteDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Daniele Carvalho NascimentoDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
David Fernando ColónDepartamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Vanessa de Fátima BorgesDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
José Carlos Alves-FilhoDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Fernando Queiróz CunhaDepartamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis, an overwhelming inflammatory response syndrome secondary to infection, is one of the costliest and deadliest medical conditions worldwide. Neutrophils are classically considered to be essential players in the host defense against invading pathogens. However, several investigations have shown that impairment of neutrophil migration to the site of infection, also referred to as neutrophil paralysis, occurs during severe sepsis, resulting in an inability of the host to contain and eliminate the infection. On the other hand, the neutrophil antibacterial arsenal contributes to tissue damage and the development of organ dysfunction during sepsis. In this review, we provide an overview of the main events in which neutrophils play a beneficial or deleterious role in the outcome of sepsis.

Indexed as

chemotactic receptorsneutrophil migrationorgan dysfunctionsepsistoll-like receptors

Identifiers

PMID27199981
PMCPMC4844928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.