Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199960›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Experimental Evolution on a Wild Mammal Species Results in Modifications of Gut Microbial Communities.

Kevin D Kohl, Edyta T Sadowska, Agata M Rudolf, M Denise Dearing, Paweł Koteja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Host specificity of the gut microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimal integration between host physiology and functions of the gut microbiome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying patterns of phylosymbiosis in host-associated microbial communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Evolving as a holobiont.PLoS biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin D KohlDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, USA.
Edyta T SadowskaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Agata M RudolfInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
M Denise DearingDepartment of Biology, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Paweł KotejaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative studies have shown that diet, life history, and phylogeny interact to determine microbial community structure across mammalian hosts. However, these studies are often confounded by numerous factors. Selection experiments offer unique opportunities to validate conclusions and test hypotheses generated by comparative studies. We used a replicated, 15-generation selection experiment on bank voles (Myodes glareolus) that have been selected for high swim-induced aerobic metabolism, predatory behavior toward crickets, and the ability to maintain body mass on a high-fiber, herbivorous diet. We predicted that selection on host performance, mimicking adaptive radiation, would result in distinct microbial signatures. We collected foregut and cecum samples from animals that were all fed the same nutrient-rich diet and had not been subjected to any performance tests. We conducted microbial inventories of gut contents by sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. We found no differences in cecal microbial community structure or diversity between control lines and the aerobic or predatory lines. However, the cecal chambers of voles selected for herbivorous capability harbored distinct microbial communities that exhibited higher diversity than control lines. The foregut communities of herbivorous-selected voles were also distinct from control lines. Overall, this experiment suggests that differences in microbial communities across herbivorous mammals may be evolved, and not solely driven by current diet or other transient factors.

Indexed as

artificial selectiongut microbiomeherbivoryhost-microbe interactionsvoles

Identifiers

PMID27199960
PMCPMC4854874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.