Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199924›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Anti-biofilm Activity as a Health Issue.

Sylvie Miquel, Rosyne Lagrafeuille, Bertrand Souweine, Christiane Forestier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Isolation of Thermophilic BacteriaInternational journal of dentistry · 2024
    Article
  17. Inhibition ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sylvie MiquelLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement - UMR, CNRS 6023, Université Clermont Auvergne Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Rosyne LagrafeuilleLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement - UMR, CNRS 6023, Université Clermont Auvergne Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bertrand SouweineLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement - UMR, CNRS 6023, Université Clermont AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France; Service de Réanimation Médicale Polyvalente, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-FerrandFrance.
Christiane ForestierLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement - UMR, CNRS 6023, Université Clermont Auvergne Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation and persistence of surface-attached microbial communities, known as biofilms, are responsible for 75% of human microbial infections (National Institutes of Health). Biofilm lifestyle confers several advantages to the pathogens, notably during the colonization process of medical devices and/or patients' organs. In addition, sessile bacteria have a high tolerance to exogenous stress including anti-infectious agents. Biofilms are highly competitive communities and some microorganisms exhibit anti-biofilm capacities such as bacterial growth inhibition, exclusion or competition, which enable them to acquire advantages and become dominant. The deciphering and control of anti-biofilm properties represent future challenges in human infection control. The aim of this review is to compare and discuss the mechanisms of natural bacterial anti-biofilm strategies/mechanisms recently identified in pathogenic, commensal and probiotic bacteria and the main synthetic strategies used in clinical practice, particularly for catheter-related infections.

Indexed as

anti-biofilmbiofilmlock solutionpathogensprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID27199924
PMCPMC4845594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.