Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199911›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

A Comprehensive Characterization of Simple Sequence Repeats in the Sequenced Trichoderma Genomes Provides Valuable Resources for Marker Development.

Sahil Mahfooz, Satyendra P Singh, Ramraje Rakh, Arpita Bhattacharya, Nishtha Mishra, Poonam C Singh, Puneet S Chauhan, Chandra S Nautiyal, Aradhana Mishra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Genome Analysis Across 128Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Tools for MonitoringFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sahil MahfoozDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Satyendra P SinghDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Ramraje RakhMaharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Medical College Latur, India.
Arpita BhattacharyaDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Nishtha MishraDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Poonam C SinghDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Puneet S ChauhanDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Chandra S NautiyalDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Aradhana MishraDivision of Plant Microbe Interaction, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Botanical Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research · INNational Botanical Research Institute · INMaharashtra Institute of Medical Science and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of genus Trichoderma are known worldwide for mycoparasitism. To gain a better insight into the organization and evolution of their genomes, we used an in silico approach to compare the occurrence, relative abundance and density of SSRs in Trichoderma atroviride, T. harzianum, T. reesei, and T. virens. Our analysis revealed that in all the four genome sequences studied, the occurrence, relative abundance, and density of microsatellites varied and was not influenced by genome sizes. The relative abundance and density of SSRs positively correlated with the G + C content of their genomes. The maximum frequency of SSRs was observed in the smallest genome of T. reesei whereas it was least in second smallest genome of T. atroviride. Among different classes of repeats, the tri-nucleotide repeats were abundant in all the genomes and accounts for ∼38%, whereas hexa-nuceotide repeats were the least (∼10.2%). Further evaluation of the conservation of motifs in the transcript sequences shows a 49.5% conservation among all the motifs. In order to study polymorphism in Trichoderma isolates, 12 polymorphic SSR markers were developed. Of the 12 markers, 6 markers are from T. atroviride and remaining 6 belong to T. harzianum. SSR markers were found to be more polymorphic from T. atroviride with an average polymorphism information content value of 0.745 in comparison with T. harzianum (0.615). Twelve polymorphic markers obtained in this study clearly demonstrate the utility of newly developed SSR markers in establishing genetic relationships among different isolates of Trichoderma.

Indexed as

comparative genomicsgenetic diversitymicrosatellitesmotif conservationTrichoderma

Identifiers

PMID27199911
PMCPMC4846858
OpenAlexW2344435308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.