ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016
Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Workplace Incivility: Who Is Most Targeted and Who Is Most Harmed?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment.Journal of management · 2024Article
- Sexual Harassment at Work: Scoping Review of Reviews.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024Article
- How harassment is depriving universities of talent: a national survey of STEM academics in the UK.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Association of Gender and Race/Ethnicity with Internal Medicine In-Training Examination Performance in Graduate Medical Education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Who Benefits Most? A Multisite Study of Coaching and Resident Well-being.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Employee Health and Wellness Outcomes Associated With Perceived Discrimination in Academic Medicine: A Qualitative Analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Students' Emotional Well-Being, and Perceived Faculty Incivility and Just Behavior Before and During COVID-19.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessing civility at an academic health science center: Implications for employee satisfaction and well-being.PloS one · 2021Article
- Women Surgeons' Experiences of Interprofessional Workplace Conflict.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- WORKPLACE INCIVILITY EXPERIENCED BY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION FACULTY.The Journal of health administration education · 2019Article
- Fighting Incivility in the Workplace for Women and for All Workers: The Challenge of Primary Prevention.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Is More Always Merrier? Intersectionality as an Antecedent of Job Insecurity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Confronting Subtle Workplace Mistreatment: The Importance of Leaders as Allies.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scholars have proposed that interpersonal workplace discrimination toward members of oppressed social groups has become covert and subtle rather than overt and explicit and that such experiences lead to negative outcomes for targets. The present study examined this proposition by examining experiences and consequences of workplace incivility-a seemingly harmless form of interpersonal maltreatment-based on gender, sexual orientation, and their intersection. A sample of 1,300 academic faculty (52% male, 86% White) participated in an online survey study assessing their experiences of workplace incivility, job stress, job satisfaction, job identity centrality, and demographics. Results showed that sexual minority women reported the highest levels of workplace incivility. Findings also revealed that women reported lower job satisfaction than men and that heterosexuals reported higher job stress and lower job identity centrality than sexual minorities with higher levels of incivility. Thus, sexual minority status buffered the negative effects of incivility for sexual minorities. These findings point to the resiliency of sexual minorities in the face of interpersonal stressors at work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.