ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2016
Is there Progress? An Overview of Selecting Biomarker Candidates for Major Depressive Disorder.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemokines in depression in health and in inflammatory illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- Smartphone-Based Monitoring of Objective and Subjective Data in Affective Disorders: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Brain and behavioral correlates of insulin resistance in youth with depression and obesity.Hormones and behavior · 2019Trial
- Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Suicide Attempts Among Young Patients With Major Depressive Disorder With Subclinical Hypothyroidism: A Cross-Sectional Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Altered Dynamic Functional Connectivity of the Frontoparietal Network in Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence From a Large-Scale Resting-State fMRI Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Neuroinflammation-A Crucial Factor in the Pathophysiology of Depression-A Comprehensive Review.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- From Serendipity to Precision: Integrating AI, Multi-Omics, and Human-Specific Models for Personalized Neuropsychiatric Care.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Advances and Challenges in Depression Marker Research.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
- Single-cell transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies mitochondrial targets in immune cells for Major Depressive Disorder.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- The Advantages of Combining Therapies in Treating Psychiatric Patients.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Genotypic variation in the promoter region of the CRH-248 gene interacts with early rearing experiences to disrupt the development of the HPA axis in infant rhesus macaques (Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Upregulation of S100A8 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with depression treated with SSRIs: a pilot study.Proteome science · 2023Article
- Identification of mitophagy-related biomarkers and immune infiltration in major depressive disorder.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Major Depressive Disorder: A Multilevel Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Role of Tryptophan Metabolites in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Reward-Based Decision-Making Engages Distinct Modes of Cross-Frequency Coupling.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Comprehensive analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress and immune infiltration in major depressive disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Biological Diagnosis of Depression: A Biomarker Panel from Several Nonspecial Indicators Instead of the Specific Biomarker(s).Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
- Serum NLRP3 Inflammasome and BDNF: Potential Biomarkers Differentiating Reactive and Endogenous Depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Assessing the links between childhood trauma, C-reactive protein and response to antidepressant treatment in patients with affective disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) contributes to a significant worldwide disease burden, expected to be second only to heart disease by 2050. However, accurate diagnosis has been a historical weakness in clinical psychiatry. As a result, there is a demand for diagnostic modalities with greater objectivity that could improve on current psychiatric practice that relies mainly on self-reporting of symptoms and clinical interviews. Over the past two decades, literature on a growing number of putative biomarkers for MDD increasingly suggests that MDD patients have significantly different biological profiles compared to healthy controls. However, difficulty in elucidating their exact relationships within depression pathology renders individual markers inconsistent diagnostic tools. Consequently, further biomarker research could potentially improve our understanding of MDD pathophysiology as well as aid in interpreting response to treatment, narrow differential diagnoses, and help refine current MDD criteria. Representative of this, multiplex assays using multiple sources of biomarkers are reported to be more accurate options in comparison to individual markers that exhibit lower specificity and sensitivity, and are more prone to confounding factors. In the future, more sophisticated multiplex assays may hold promise for use in screening and diagnosing depression and determining clinical severity as an advance over relying solely on current subjective diagnostic criteria. A pervasive limitation in existing research is heterogeneity inherent in MDD studies, which impacts the validity of biomarker data. Additionally, small sample sizes of most studies limit statistical power. Yet, as the RDoC project evolves to decrease these limitations, and stronger studies with more generalizable data are developed, significant advances in the next decade are expected to yield important information in the development of MDD biomarkers for use in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.